Literature DB >> 451490

Interobserver variation in the evaluation of radiologic changes of rheumatoid arthritis.

A Larsen, J Edgren, E Harju, L Laasonen, T Reitamo.   

Abstract

The variation between four radiologists in the evaluation of hand, wrist, and foot radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis was examined. The recognition of individual radiologic changes varied considerably as judged by the findings of the different observers. Erosion and joint space narrowing were interpreted more uniformly than soft tissue swelling and osteoporosis. When the radiographs were graded from 0 to 5 using standard reference radiographs, more than 90% of them were graded uniformly or with a difference of only one grade. The investigation has shown that when applying grading of rheumatoid arthritis according to standard reference radiographs, the interobserver variation is considerably less than when pure individual radiological changes of rheumatoid arhtritis are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 451490     DOI: 10.3109/03009747909105347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation of erosions: a quantitative method for assessing long-term remittive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W M O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  What happens to patients with rheumatoid arthritis? The long-term outcome of treatment.

Authors:  T D Spector; D L Scott
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Observer variation in skeletal radiology.

Authors:  W P Cockshott; W M Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Disease activity and joint damage progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: relation to IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor.

Authors:  K B Eberhardt; L Truedsson; H Pettersson; B Svensson; L Stigsson; J L Eberhardt; F A Wollheim
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.

Authors:  S Boini; F Guillemin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis: how many patients are required in a treatment trial to test disease modification?

Authors:  J T Sharp; F Wolfe; M Corbett; H Isomaki; D M Mitchell; D E Furst; J Sibley; M Shipley
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  The rheumatoid heel: its relationship to other disorders in the rheumatoid foot.

Authors:  M Bouysset; J Tebib; G Weil; E Noel; F Colson; G Llorca; E Lejeune; M Bouvier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Enzo D'Ingianna; Mario Fumagalli; Magda Scarpellini; Tania Fiorini; Enrico Luigi Chérié-Lignière; Benedetta Panni; Franco Fiorentini; Vincenzo Corbelli; Nebiat Belai Beyene; Claudio Mastaglio; Carlo Severi; Maurizio Locati; Marco Cazzola; Guido Menozzi; Giuseppe Monti; Francesco Saccardo; Giuseppina Alfieri; Fabiola Atzeni
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Long term progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; B L Coulton; A J Popert
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Drug trials in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H Berry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.