Literature DB >> 4466505

Classification systems used in medical libraries.

G Scheerer, L E Hines.   

Abstract

The present study identifies the classification systems used in 941 libraries. It explores the reasons behind the choice of the National Library of Medicine Classification by 589 libraries. Reclassification procedures were investigated through a questionnaire sent to twenty-five libraries that have changed to NLM since 1959. Statistics and replies are given on: the classification systems employed prior to reclassification; the use of broad or specific Library of Congress class numbers in the LC schedules outside the scope of the NLM schedules; the number of catalogers in each library doing the reclassification; the use of cut-off dates for retrospective materials; the adoption of MeSH headings; user preference; and cost differences. Chief reasons for the change to NLM proved to be local circumstances, currency, arrangement of subclasses by NLM, its dovetailing with the LC Classification, and reliance upon nationally centralized cataloging services.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4466505      PMCID: PMC198794     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  4 in total

1.  Cunningham classification.

Authors:  T M Hodges
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1975-01

2.  Adjusting to progress: interactions between the National Library of Medicine and health sciences librarians, 1961-2001.

Authors:  Betsy L Humphreys
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-01

3.  Reclassification in a small decentralized medical library.

Authors:  J G Tong; P W Brennen; G D Byrd
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1977-07

4.  Classification of clinical nursing texts: a new approach.

Authors:  A Caffarel
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1978-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.