Literature DB >> 445504

Chemotherapy for murine ovarian cancer: a rationale for ip therapy with adriamycin.

R F Ozols, G Y Locker, J H Doroshow, K R Grotzinger, C E Myers, R I Fisher, R C Young.   

Abstract

The metastatic spread of a trnasplantable murine ovarian cancer is similar to the spread of ovarian cancer in patients with advanced disease, making it a useful model to investigate novel experimental therapies. The ip inoculation of 10(6) tumor cells into C3HeB/FeJ mice leads to the formation of ascites, sub-diaphragmatic tumor deposits, intra-abdominal tumors, and death within 25 days. Adriamycin (ADR) was found to be an active agent against this murine ovarian cancer. The effects of ADR were dependent upon the route of administration. A single ip LD10 dose of ADR (5 mg/kg) administered 2 days after inoculation with 10(6) tumor cells produced long-term survival (greater than 60 days) in 70% of the mice. An iv LD10 dose had no effect on survival. The survival advantage of ip ADR (compared to the iv route) was found to be related to: (a) a greater suppression of DNA synthesis in the tumor; (b) a rapid penetration of ADR into the nuclei of ascites tumor cells and into sub-diaphragmatic tumor deposits; and (c) significantly higher levels of ADR in tumor cells following ip administration. The ip route may also be less cardiotoxic since the peak levels after an iv dose were three times greater than after an equal ip dose. If local toxicity does not prove to be a major problem, then ip ADR may be a useful mode of therapy in patients with intra-abdominal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 445504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  9 in total

1.  Lymphatic transport of liposome-encapsulated drugs following intraperitoneal administration - effect of lipid composition.

Authors:  K Hirano; C A Hunt; A Strubbe; R D Macgregor
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Intraperitoneal approach to regional hyperthermia--possible anticancer applications.

Authors:  G V Smith; R MacMillan; J Stribling
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Abdominal metastases from colorectal cancer: intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Hamza Guend; Sunil Patel; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases, systematic review of the literature and focused personal experience.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Paola Fugazzola; Giulia Montori; Luca Ansaloni; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

6.  Effect of tolmetin sodium dihydrate on adhesion formation by intraperitoneal administration of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  K E Rodgers; W Girgis; G S diZerega
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  T cells expressing the gamma delta T-cell receptor potentiate coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis.

Authors:  S A Huber; A Moraska; M Choate
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  Intraperitoneal therapy in the management of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  M Markman; T Hakes; B Reichman; W Hoskins; S Rubin; W Jones; L Almadones; J L Lewis
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

9.  Photodynamic therapy of ascites tumours within the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  Z Tochner; J B Mitchell; P Smith; F Harrington; E Glatstein; D Russo; A Russo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.