Literature DB >> 445503

Different chemotherapeutic sensitivities and host factors affecting prognosis in advanced ovarian carcinoma versus minimal residual disease.

J H Edmonson, T R Fleming, D G Decker, G D Malkasian, E O Jorgensen, J A Jefferies, M J Webb, L K Kvols.   

Abstract

Treatment of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (stages IIIB and IV) using either cyclophosphamide alone (1 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) plus adriamycin (40 mg/m2) by iv injection every 3 weeks each produced partial regression in approximately one third of the patients. Survival curves and time-to-progression curves for the two regimens were nearly identical in these patients with advanced disease. These same regimens produced different results when used monthly in patients who had minimal residual disease (stages II and IIIA). In patients with minimal residual disease the therapeutic index of the combination regimen was superior to that of cyclophosphamide alone. Prognosis was better overall among patients with minimal residual disease than among patients with advanced disease. Within the minimal-disease group grossly complete excision of tumor prior to chemotherapy was associated with still better prognosis. Among patients with advanced disease, prognosis was significantly better for older patients despite their generally less favorable performance scores. Much of this prognostic superiority appeared to be related to menopausal status and presumably to the depletion of endogenous estrogens in the older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 445503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  7 in total

1.  Semi-parametric regression model for survival data: graphical visualization with R.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C J Rodenburg; F J Cleton
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  R S Bush
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1983-10

Review 4.  Update in cancer chemotherapy: genitourinary tract cancer, Part 5: Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J C Wright
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Hexamethylmelamine, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (HAC) versus cis-dichlorodiamineplatinum, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Sessa; G Bolis; N Colombo; M D'Incalci; B Mermillod; I Valente; C Mangioni
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Low-dose cyclophosphamide versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer. A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  G Bolis; G Bortolozzi; G Carinelli; M D'Incalci; F Gramellini; L Morasca; C Mangioni
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  V Torri; E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.