Literature DB >> 443338

Comparative evaluation of current ophthalmodynamometers.

J T Holladay, J B Arnoult, R S Ruiz.   

Abstract

Seventy-five patients under 40 years of age with no history of ocular, cardiovascular, or cerebrovascular disease were examined with four commonly used ophthalmodynamometers. There was a significant difference in the absolute values measured with each instrument and the ophthalmic to brachial artery pressure ratio. The standard deviations were comparable between 8.1 and 10.2%. The absolute value of the average percent difference between the right and the left eye ranged from 3.6% with the Galin unit to 6.7% with the Sisler unit. Limits of +/- 15% for ophthalmic artery to brachial artery pressure ratio and 10% for right to left pressure difference should be used for 95% confidence levels. There was a small but definite correlation between the ocular coefficient of rigidity and pressure differences between direct and indirect instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 443338     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90301-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  2 in total

1.  Prediction of intracranial pressure from noninvasive transocular venous and arterial hemodynamic measurements: a pilot study.

Authors:  Henry W Querfurth; Steven W Arms; Christoph M Lichy; William T Irwin; Thorsten Steiner
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Relation between pressure determined by ophthalmodynamometry and aortic pressure in the dog.

Authors:  W H Morgan; D Y Yu; V A Alder; S J Cringle; I J Constable
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.