Literature DB >> 4433176

The operative cholangiogram: its interpretation, accuracy and value in association with cholecystectomy.

J S McCormick, D N Bremner, J W Thomson, T J McNair, T Philp.   

Abstract

The value and errors of one method of operative cholangiography were assessed prospectively with the aim of reducing further the incidence of unnecessary explorations of the common bile duct and the occurrence of residual stones. Operative cholangiograms were obtained using a cystic duct cannula in 174 cases, the technical failure rate being 2%. All cases were followed up using intravenous cholangiography where necessary. Of 129 judged normal by the operator, 2 were found to have common bile duct stones-false negative rate 1%. Of 45 judged abnormal by the operator, 10 had negative explorations- false positive rate 6%. Anomalies were discovered in 12% of patients. It is concluded that meticulous technique and accurate interpretation are essential for the best results. The high incidence of anatomical variations present is of interest and this alone emphasises the necessity of carrying out the investigation and the need of experienced interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4433176      PMCID: PMC1343818          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197412000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Routine operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  F W Taylor
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-06

2.  Operative cholangiography.

Authors:  R E Fraser; T J McNair
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1970-03

3.  The value of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  R A Lawson; A A Gunn
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1970-07

4.  The value of radiomanometry in bile duct surgery.

Authors:  O Daniel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Metallic cannula as an aid to cystic-duct operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J S Aldrete; E S Judd
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 7.616

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Preoperative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: feasibility of using spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  A H Kwon; H Inui; A Imamura; S Uetsuji; Y Kamiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Contact cholangiography.

Authors:  R S Stubbs
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Laparoscopic management of bile duct and bowel injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A H Kwon; H Inui; Y Kamiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  A critical assessment of fluoroscopy in peroperative cholangiography.

Authors:  M Feeley; A L Peel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.891

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.