Literature DB >> 441361

Risk of breast cancer following low-dose radiation exposure.

J D Boice, C E Land, R E Shore, J E Norman, M Tokunaga.   

Abstract

Risk of breast cancer following radiation exposure was studied, based on surveys of tuberculosis patients who had multiple fluoroscopic examinations of the chest, mastitis patients given radiotherapy, and atomic bomb survivors. Analysis suggests that the risk is greatest for persons exposed as adolescents, although exposure at all ages carries some risk. The dose-response relationship was consistent with linearity in all studies. Direct evidence of radiation risk at doses under 0.5 Gy (50 rad) is apparent among A-bomb survivors. Fractionation does not appear to diminish risk, nor does time since exposure (even after 45 years of observation). The interval between exposure and the clinical appearance of radiogenic breast cancer may be mediated by hormonal or other age-related factors but is unrelated to dose. Age-specific absolute risk estimates for all studies are remarkably similar. The best estimate of risk among American women exposed after age 20 is 6.6 excess cancers/10(4) WY-G-Y (10(6) WY-rad).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 441361     DOI: 10.1148/131.3.589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Mammography.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; B J Merkens; G J Sherman
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Mammography.

Authors:  R E Shore; B S Pasternack
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Normalizing Heterogeneous Medical Imaging Data to Measure the Impact of Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Luís A Bastião Silva; Luís S Ribeiro; Milton Santos; Nuno Neves; Dulce Francisco; Carlos Costa; José Luis Oliveira
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A note on "Job related mortality risks of Hanford workers and their relation to cancer effects of measured doses of external radiation".

Authors:  E S Gilbert; G R Petersen
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1985-02

Review 5.  Radiation-induced gliomas: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryuya Yamanaka; Azusa Hayano; Tomohiko Kanayama
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  G R Howe; G J Sherman; R M Semenciw; A B Miller
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Mammography.

Authors:  D J Bross
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Franca Podo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  From energy deposition to cancer.

Authors:  W Burkart
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

10.  Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Nazanin Yaghmai; Cecilia Matilda Jude; John J Demarco; Christopher H Cagnon; Jonathan G Goldin; Andrew N Primak; Donna M Stevens; Dianna D Cody; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.