Literature DB >> 4285890

Heterogeneity of liver alcohol dehydrogenase on starch-gel electrophoresis.

J S McKinley-McKee, D W Moss.   

Abstract

1. Purified horse-liver alcohol dehydrogenase is heterogeneous on starch-gel electrophoresis in several buffer systems. 2. The electrophoretic pattern is altered by the addition to the buffers of oxidized or reduced coenzymes, isobutyramide, metal ions or metal-chelating agents. 3. The effect of coenzymes on the pattern suggests that the major cause of the observed heterogeneity is not the existence of isoenzymes, but the presence in the enzyme preparations of coenzyme-enzyme complexes or complexes with other nucleotides similar to, but less reactive than, the coenzymes. 4. Metal ions and chelating agents influence the electrophoretic separation by partial denaturation and inactivation of the enzyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1965        PMID: 4285890      PMCID: PMC1207191          DOI: 10.1042/bj0960583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  7 in total

Review 1.  [MULTIPLE FORMS OF ENZYMES].

Authors:  T WIELAND; G PFLEIDERER
Journal:  Adv Enzymol Relat Subj Biochem       Date:  1963

2.  Starch gel electrophoresis as a criterion for the purity of crystalline yeast alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  D C WATTS; C DONNINGER
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Dissociation of lactate dehydrogenase into subunits with guanidine hydrochloride.

Authors:  E APPELLA; C L MARKERT
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1961-11-20       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  The preparation and properties of crystalline alcohol dehydrogenase from liver.

Authors:  K DALZIEL
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Zone electrophoresis in starch gels: group variations in the serum proteins of normal human adults.

Authors:  O SMITHIES
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Nature and Development of Lactic Dehydrogenases: The two major types of this enzyme form molecular hybrids which change in makeup during development.

Authors:  R D Cahn; E Zwilling; N O Kaplan; L Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Lactic dehydrogenases: subfractionation of isozymes.

Authors:  P J FRITZ; K B JACOBSON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Residual activity in carboxymethylated liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  C H Reynolds; J S McKinley-McKee
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Molecular varieties of isozymes.

Authors:  C L Markert; G S Whitt
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1968-10-15

3.  Structural and functional zinc in horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  D E Drum; J H Harrison; T K Li; J L Bethune; B L Vallee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Alcohol dehydrogenase of Biomphalaria glabrata (Molusca: Pulmonata): polymorphism, genetic analysis, and interspecific variations.

Authors:  S Narang; N Narang
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Properties of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes in a strain of Drosophila melanogaster homozygous for the Adh-slow allele.

Authors:  T H Day; L Needham
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase: an electrophoretic study of the AdhS, AdhF, and AdhUF alleloenzymes.

Authors:  J O Winberg; D R Thatcher; J S McKinley-McKee
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.890

7.  Fin whale MDH-1 and MPI allozyme variation is not reflected in the corresponding DNA sequences.

Authors:  Morten Tange Olsen; Christophe Pampoulie; Anna K Daníelsdóttir; Emmelie Lidh; Martine Bérubé; Gísli A Víkingsson; Per J Palsbøll
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.