Literature DB >> 4285531

Specific cell-surface alteration by enteroviruses as reflected by viral-attachment interference.

R L Crowell.   

Abstract

Crowell, Richard L. (Hahnemann Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa.). Specific cell-surface alteration by enteroviruses as reflected by viral-attachment interference. J. Bacteriol. 91:198-204. 1966.-Exposure of HeLa cells to high levels of coxsackievirus B3 produced cells which were refractory to attachment of coxsackievirus B1, whereas poliovirus T2 attached normally. Under similar conditions, poliovirus T2 was found to interfere with the attachment of poliovirus T1 to HeLa cells without affecting the attachment rate of coxsackievirus B3. The data confirm earlier findings that the receptor sites on HeLa cells, which bind members of group B coxsackieviruses, are distinct from those for polioviruses. Quantitatively, coxsackieviruses B1 and B3 were found to be mutually exclusive in the attachment interference assay to suggest that they compete for the same receptors on the HeLa cell surface. The finding that input multiplicities of B3 virus which exceeded 500 saturated the homologous viral receptors of HeLa cells was unexpected, but was consistent with the results of interference assays. Excessive amounts of input virus did not, however, inhibit eclipse of homologous cell-associated virus. Attachment interference between enteroviruses occurred even though the interfering virus was eclipsed prior to addition of challenge virus. The finding that enterovirus attachment interference was reversible with acid pH suggested that attachment and eclipse of enterovirus does not result in a permanent alteration of the cell membrane and that these events occur at the cell surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 4285531      PMCID: PMC315932          DOI: 10.1128/jb.91.1.198-204.1966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  23 in total

1.  INTERFERENCE BETWEEN ENTEROVIRUSES AND CONDITIONS EFFECTING ITS REVERSAL.

Authors:  C E CORDS; J J HOLLAND
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 3.616

2.  GENOMIC MASKING PRODUCED BY DOUBLE-INFECTION OF HELA CELLS WITH HETEROTYPIC POLIOVIRUSES.

Authors:  E WECKER; G LEDERHILGER
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  EFFECT OF ENZYMES ON THE INTERACTION OF ENTEROVIRUSES WITH LIVING HELA CELLS.

Authors:  I ZAJAC; R L CROWELL
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  RESCUE OF ONE PHENOTYPE IN MIXED INFECTIONS WITH HEAT-DEFECTIVE MUTANTS OF TYPE 1 POLIOVIRUS.

Authors:  P D COOPER
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  INTERFERENCE BETWEEN POLIOVIRUSES INDUCED BY STRAINS THAT CANNOT MULTIPLY.

Authors:  P POHJANPELTO; P D COOPER
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE FORMATION OF POLIOVIRUS.

Authors:  S DALES; H J EGGERS; I TAMM; G E PALADE
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  An analysis of interference between active polioviruses types 1 and 2 in HeLa cells.

Authors:  N LEDINKO
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Genetic recombination with poliovirus type 1. Studies of crosses between a normal horse serum-resistant mutant and several guanidine-resistant mutants of the same strain.

Authors:  N LEDINKO
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  The effect of anticellular sera on virus multiplication in tissue culture.

Authors:  K HABEL; J W HORNIBROOK; N C GREGG; R J SILVERBERG; K K TAKEMOTO
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  The use of sodium dodecyl sulfate in studies on the interaction of poliovirus and HeLa cells.

Authors:  B MANDEL
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  31 in total

1.  Interaction with coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor, but not with decay-accelerating factor (DAF), induces A-particle formation in a DAF-binding coxsackievirus B3 isolate.

Authors:  Aaron M Milstone; JenniElizabeth Petrella; Melissa D Sanchez; Mariam Mahmud; J Charles Whitbeck; Jeffrey M Bergelson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Coxsackieviruses B1, B3, and B5 use decay accelerating factor as a receptor for cell attachment.

Authors:  D R Shafren; R C Bates; M V Agrez; R L Herd; G F Burns; R D Barry
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Properties of the deoxycholate-solubilized HeLa cell plasma membrane receptor for binding group B coxsackieviruses.

Authors:  D L Krah; R L Crowell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  A monoclonal antibody specific for the cellular receptor for the group B coxsackieviruses.

Authors:  K H Hsu; K Lonberg-Holm; B Alstein; R L Crowell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Characterization of a YAC-1 mouse cell receptor for group B coxsackieviruses.

Authors:  K H Hsu; R L Crowell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Homologous interference by incomplete Sendai virus particles: changes in virus-specific ribonucleic acid synthesis.

Authors:  A Portner; D W Kingsbury
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Susceptibility of differentiating muscle cells of the fetal mouse in culture to coxsackievirus A13.

Authors:  R J Goldberg; R L Crowell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Comparative studies of the regeneration of HeLa cell receptors for poliovirus T1 and coxsackievirus B3.

Authors:  N H Levitt; R L Crowell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Increased resistance of SV40 transformed human amnion cells to poliovirus infection.

Authors:  E Hahn; J Fogh
Journal:  Arch Gesamte Virusforsch       Date:  1970

10.  Competition for cellular receptor sites among selected aphthoviruses.

Authors:  K Sekiguchi; A J Franke; B Baxt
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.