Literature DB >> 427728

Relation between mammary cancer growth kinetics and the intervals between screenings.

L Heuser, J S Spratt, H C Polk, J Buchanan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to consider the time interval for periodic mammographic screening for breast cancer. One hundred fifteen breast cancers occurring in 10,128 women receiving over 30,000 mammograms over a four year period were reviewed. Tumors were diagnosed at three time intervals: 1) first screening (39/115); 2) annual examination (27/115); and 3) at an examination that occurred less than twelve months from a previous annual examination (10/115). Also, there were tumors that grew to a palpable dimensions and were self-detected between annual examinations (39/115). Our opinion is that screening intervals should be individualized to each patient according to risk factors and suspicious mammographic findings. Further, there is a significant number of breast cancers that grow too fast to be detected effectively by annual mammography. Suspicious mammographic findings did not exist before these cancers reached palpable dimensions. Other risk factors characterizing the hosts who develop these fast growing cancers are yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 427728     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197903)43:3<857::aid-cncr2820430312>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Locally advanced breast cancers are more likely to present as Interval Cancers: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657, InterSPORE Trial).

Authors:  Cheryl Lin; Meredith Becker Buxton; Dan Moore; Helen Krontiras; Lisa Carey; Angela DeMichele; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta Liu; Olufunmilayo Olapade; Christina Yau; Donald Berry; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Interval cancer and survival in a randomized breast cancer screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; A von Rosen; M Wiege; B Nilsson; S Goldman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Breast cancer detected by mass screening using physical examination alone.

Authors:  T Morimoto; K Komaki; K Oshimo; T Yamakawa; N Mitsuyama; T Tanaka; Y Monden
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1987-09

5.  Sensitivity determination of cancer screening programmes with the aid of "interval cases".

Authors:  F W Schwartz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  The natural history of breast cancer: a chronological analysis of breast cancer progression using data from the SEER database.

Authors:  Jinbo Wu; Hongjun Liu; Taobo Hu; Mengping Long; Xiaojie Zhou; Shu Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

7.  A simulation model of the natural history of human breast cancer.

Authors:  S Koscielny; M Tubiana; A J Valleron
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.