Literature DB >> 427573

Is there an active mechanism limiting the influence of the sympathetic system on the cerebral vascular bed? Evidence for vasomotor escape from sympathetic stimulation in the rabbit.

R Sercombe, P Lacombe, P Aubineau, H Mamo, E Pinard, A M Reynier-Rebuffel, J Seylaz.   

Abstract

The influence of the cervical sympathetic chain on cerebral circulation in the rabbit was studied by means of 3 complementary techniques. Two dynamic techniques involving chronically implanted probes were used: blood flow in the caudate nucleus (CN) was measured by thermal clearance; tissue PO2 and PCO2 in the same structure were measured by mass spectrometry. Other variables measured continuously and simultaneously included arterial blood pressure (BP), PaO2 and PaCO2. The third technique was a tissue sampling method based on the Fick principle and using 14C1 ethanol as tracer. Blood flow in 7 regions was measured at stable BP, PaO2 and PaCO2. Stimulation of the sympathetic chain at 15 Hz induced mean maximal decreases in CN blood flow of 23.9% (thermal clearance) and 24.4% (ethanol technique). Mean decrease of PO2 in the CN at 15 Hz was 16.6%. Significant falls in blood flow were observed with the ethanol technique in all 7 structures measured. During prolonged stimulation (greater than 1 min) CN blood flow and PO2 were found to escape towards the baseline level, which was sometimes even exceeded during the stimulation (blood flow). Stimulation frequency had only a very moderate influence on the rate of escape, and no evidence of a metabolic mechanism was found, although injection of barbiturate decreased the escape. These results are discussed with respect to the conflicting evidence on the effects of sympathetic stimulation in the brain, and to possible mechanisms for the escape phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 427573     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90008-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

1.  Biology of the rabbit.

Authors:  Nathan R Brewer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Electroacupuncture of the Ophthalmic Branch of the Trigeminal Nerve: Effects on Prefrontal Cortex Blood Flow.

Authors:  Takuya Suzuki; Hideaki Waki; Kenji Imai; Tatsuya Hisajima
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2020-06-16

3.  Cerebral blood flow changes associated with fluctuations in alpha and theta rhythm during sleep onset in humans.

Authors:  Futoshi Kotajima; Guy E Meadows; Mary J Morrell; Douglas R Corfield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Critical evaluation of cerebral blood flow measurements made with 14C-ethanol.

Authors:  P Lacombe; P Meric; A M Reynier-Rebuffel; J Seylaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Inward rectification in rat cerebral arterioles; involvement of potassium ions in autoregulation.

Authors:  F R Edwards; G D Hirst; G D Silverberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Differential responses to CO2 and sympathetic stimulation in the cerebral and femoral circulations in humans.

Authors:  Philip N Ainslie; Jon C Ashmead; Kojiro Ide; Barbara J Morgan; Marc J Poulin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Evidence for a predominant intrinsic sympathetic control of cerebral blood flow alterations in an animal model of cerebral arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Carsten Stüer; Toshiki Ikeda; Michael Stoffel; Gerd Luippold; Carlo Schaller; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  Parasympathomimetic influence of carbachol on local cerebral blood flow in the rabbit by a direct vasodilator action and an inhibition of the sympathetic-mediated vasoconstriction.

Authors:  P Aubineau; R Sercombe; J Seylaz
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Why is the neural control of cerebral autoregulation so controversial?

Authors:  Philip N Ainslie; Patrice Brassard
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-03-03

Review 10.  Cerebral oxygenation and hyperthermia.

Authors:  Anthony R Bain; Shawnda A Morrison; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.