Literature DB >> 424688

A seven-year follow-up of proximal gastric vagotomy. Clinical results.

I Liavåg, M Roland.   

Abstract

During a 7-year period proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) was performed in 565 patients. Of these, 210 patients with duodenal ulcer and 14 with dyspepsia without demonstrable ulcer at the time of operation were followed for 5--7 years. Sixty-six percent are symptom-free (Visick I), 23% have no complaints when they take certain dietary measures (Visick II), 3% are improved but still have periods of dyspepsia (Visick III), and 8% are failures because of recurrent ulcer (Visick IV). There were 4 duodenal, 3 pyloric, 5 prepyloric, and 7 lesser-curve gastric recurrences. There were one operative death (0.2%) and one major complication (0.2%). The side effects after PGV are mild, infrequent, and seldom of any significance to the patients. Diarrhoea and dumping are virtually eliminated. Body weight was stable during the whole period of study, and blood chemistry did not disclose any deficiency in haemoglobin, serum iron, or vitamin B12 which might be attributed to PGV. It is concluded that 5--7 years after proximal gastric vagotomy for duodenal ulcer there is a 10% recurrence rate, but the low risk of death and of severe complications and the lack of significant side effects more than outweight the high recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 424688     DOI: 10.3109/00365527909179845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  10 in total

1.  Proximal gastric vagotomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer with pyloric stenosis: a thirteen-year experience.

Authors:  O C Lunde; I Liavåg; M Roland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Recurrent ulceration after proximal gastric vagotomy for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  O C Lunde; I Liavåg; M Roland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  How do clinical results after proximal gastric vagotomy compare with the Visick grade pattern of healthy controls?

Authors:  C Muller; B Engelke; L Fiedler; A Marrie; E Mühe; W Schmitz-Harbauer; V Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Proximal gastric vagotomy in dyspeptic patients without an ulcer.

Authors:  S T Aase; I Liavåg; M Roland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Proximal gastric vagotomy after five years.

Authors:  D W Storey; P B Boulos; M W Ward; C G Clark
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Parietal cell vagotomy: experience with 114 patients with prepyloric or duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J W Hollinshead; R C Smith; D J Gillett
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Should it be parietal cell vagotomy or selective vagotomy-antrectomy for treatment of duodenal ulcer? A progress report.

Authors:  P H Jordan; J Thornby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Complications associated with ulcer recurrence following gastric surgery for ulcer disease.

Authors:  J G Penston; E J Boyd; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1992-02

9.  Highly selective vagotomy in duodenal ulceration and its complications. A 12-year review.

Authors:  T F Gorey; F Lennon; S J Heffernan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy.

Authors:  B D Schirmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.