Literature DB >> 420999

Prospective study of ultrasonography in chronic pancreatic disease.

W R Lees, A G Vallon, M E Denyer, S P Vahl, P B Cotton.   

Abstract

Grey-scale ultrasonography was used in 212 unselected patients in whom the presence or absence of pancreatic disease was subsequently confirmed by other means. Ultrasonographic criteria were established in the first 92 patients and by reference to previous experience. The remaining 120 patients were studied prospectively. The accuracy and clinical impact of the ultrasonographic diagnosis were judged alongside a standard clinical assessment. Clinical diagnoses were tentative and inaccurate. Ultrasound failed in three cases; otherwise it detected all the 33 patients with chronic pancreatic disease and correctly distinguished cancer from chronic pancreatitis. The ultrasonographic diagnosis of a normal pancreas was always correct, but four false-positive diagnoses were made in patients subsequently judged to have no pancreatic disease. Ultrasonography gave more accurate or more confident and accurate information than the clinical assessment in 57 of the 98 patients studied as problems in diagnosis. With this degree of accuracy ultrasonography should be the first imaging investigation in patients suspected of suffering from pancreatic disease. In our gastrointestinal unit the combination of grey-scale ultrasonography with techniques designed to outline the duct systems (such as endoscopic pancreatography) provides precise diagnosis and documentation of pancreatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 420999      PMCID: PMC1597619          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6157.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  19 in total

1.  Radiology of the pancreas, 1976: sonography and ductography.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Cold agglutinins.

Authors:  N Aramson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [ERP and pancreatic sonography, a critical comparison (proceedings)].

Authors:  U Holtz; J Falck; F H Franken
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  ERCP.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Comparison of ultrasound and computer-assisted tomography in pancreatic diagnosis.

Authors:  J E Husband; H B Meire; L Kreel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparative clinical impact of endoscopic pancreatography, grey-scale ultrasonography, and computed tomography (EMI scanning) in pancreatic disease: preliminary report.

Authors:  P B Cotton; M E Denyer; L Kreel; J Husband; H B Meire; W Lees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Visualization of the liver, biliary tree and pancreas. Part III: ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  K J Taylor; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1978-05

8.  Biological effects of diagnostic ultrasound: a review.

Authors:  M L Baker; G V Dalrymple
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Rapid diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  P C Freeny; T J Ball
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The value of diagnostic aids in detecting pancreas cancer.

Authors:  P J Fitzgerald; J G Fortner; R C Watson; M K Schwartz; P Sherlock; R S Benua; A L Cubilla; D Schottenfeld; D Miller; S J Winawer; C J Lightdale; S D Leidner; J S Nisselbaum; C J Menendez-Botet; M H Poleski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of endosonography in non-malignant pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Kyung W Noh; Surakit Pungpapong; Massimo Raimondo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for evaluating patients with recurrent pancreatitis.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Petrone; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children.

Authors:  P B Cotton; N J Laage
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Prospective comparison of three non-invasive tests for pancreatic disease.

Authors:  P N Foster; C J Mitchell; D R Robertson; I Hamilton; H Irving; J Kelleher; D J Lintott; P J Robinson; A T Axon; M S Losowsky
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-07

5.  Experience with the 'Triple Test' in pancreatic disease.

Authors:  H H Thompson; C L Brown; R S Murray; D L Wingate; H D Ritchie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound chronic pancreatitis criteria to the endoscopic secretin-stimulated pancreatic function test.

Authors:  Darwin L Conwell; Gregory Zuccaro; Edward Purich; Seymour Fein; John J Vargo; John A Dumot; Frederick VanLente; Rocio Lopez; Patricia Trolli
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Issa; M A Kempeneers; H C van Santvoort; T L Bollen; S Bipat; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.