Literature DB >> 4208549

Genetic control of imaginal disc development in Drosophila.

A Shearn, A Garen.   

Abstract

Many of the functions required for formation of the imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster larvae, from which adult structures are derived, are disc-specific and not required for formation of other larval tissues. Mutants blocked in disc-specific functions can produce mature viable larvae, indicating that larval development is not dependent on concomitant disc development. Some of the mutant larvae have no detectable discs (discless mutants), and other have small discs that cannot differentiate into adult structures (small disc mutants). From the results of genetic complementation and mapping experiments with such mutants, it was estimated that the genome of D. melanogaster contains around a thousand complementation groups, or about a fifth of all complementation groups in the genome, that are essential specifically for the development of all the discs. The developmental defects in some of the disc mutants appear to involve autonomous functions of the imaginal cells, and in other mutants functions provided by the larval environment to support disc development. This distinction was made on the basis of two functional tests. The purpose of one of the tests was to detect the presence in young embryos of determined imaginal cells capable of differentiating after transplantation to a wild-type host; the other test measured the capacity of early third-instar larvae to act as hosts for the further development of immature discs transplanted from a wild-type donor. Three discless mutants that were tested in this way appeared to be defective in autonomous functions of the imaginal cells, since the embryos contained no imaginal cells that could be detected in the first test, whereas the larvae, although devoid of discs, showed a normal capacity to support disc development in the second test. One of the small disc mutants tested was defective in a larval rather than an imaginal cell function, since the embryos had a normal complement of functional imaginal cells, whereas the larvae were incapable of supporting disc development. Thus, both types of disc-specific functions are essential for normal disc development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4208549      PMCID: PMC388235          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Complete and mosaic visible mutations produced by ethyl methanesulphonate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N G Brink
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  [Developmental capacity of embryonal blastema in Drosophila following cultivation in an adult host].

Authors:  E Hadorn; R Hürlimann; G Mindek; G Schubiger; M Staub
Journal:  Rev Suisse Zool       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 0.642

3.  The recovery and preliminary characterization of X chromosome mutants affecting imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Stewart; C Murphy; J W Fristrom
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B H Judd; M W Shen; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Determination of blastoderm cells in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L N Chan; W Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Imaginal disc abnormalities in lethal mutants of Drosophila.

Authors:  A Shearn; T Rice; A Garen; W Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  19 in total

1.  Loss-of-function mutations in a glutathione S-transferase suppress the prune-Killer of prune lethal interaction.

Authors:  Elayne Provost; Grafton Hersperger; Lisa Timmons; Wen Qi Ho; Evelyn Hersperger; Rosa Alcazar; Allen Shearn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Loss of cell cycle checkpoint control in Drosophila Rfc4 mutants.

Authors:  S A Krause; M L Loupart; S Vass; S Schoenfelder; S Harrison; M M Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Genetic analysis of chromosome region 63 of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A D Wohlwill; J J Bonner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Histological analysis of the dynamics of growth of imaginal discs and histoblast nests during the larval development ofDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Mandaravally Madhavan; Howard A Schneiderman
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1977-12

5.  Isolation of temperature sensitive mutations blocking clone development inDrosophila melanogaster, and the effects of a temperature sensitive cell lethal mutation on pattern formation in imaginal discs.

Authors:  Pat Simpson; Howard A Schneiderman
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1975-09

6.  Genetic studies of mutations at two loci of Drosophila melanogaster which cause a wide variety of homeotic transformations.

Authors:  Allen Shearn; Evelyn Hersperger; Grafton Hersperger
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1987-04

7.  Mutations in polycombeotic, a Drosophila polycomb-group gene, cause a wide range of maternal and zygotic phenotypes.

Authors:  M D Phillips; A Shearn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Isolation and characterization of X-linked lethal mutants affecting differentiation of the imaginal discs in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  I Kiss; G Bencze; E Fekete; A Fodor; J Gausz; P Maróy; J Szabad; J Szidonya
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genomic clones coding for some of the initial genes expressed during Drosophila development.

Authors:  B J Sina; M Pellegrini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genetic screens to identify elements of the decapentaplegic signaling pathway in Drosophila.

Authors:  L A Raftery; V Twombly; K Wharton; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.