Literature DB >> 4205047

The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mean values and variances.

M Bos, W Scharloo.   

Abstract

Disruptive and stabilizing selection were applied to thorax and wing length in Drosophila melanogaster. Disruptive selection with negative assortative mating (D(-)) practiced on thorax length caused a large increase of the phenotypic variance; practiced on wing length the increase was less striking. Disruptive selection with random mating (D(R)) caused in most lines only a temporary increase in phenotypic variance, but mean values increased considerably. Stabilizing selection (S) on thorax length or wing length did not decrease the phenotypic variance, but the mean value of the selected character declined.-The proportion of flies emerging decreased in all lines, while development time increased. Variance of development time increased in the D(-)-lines. In both D(-)-lines the frequency of flies with an abnormal number of scutellars was high (> 60% in one of the lines) and there was a temporary increase in abnormal segmentation of the abdomen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4205047      PMCID: PMC1213041     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  3 in total

1.  Selection for environmental variability of body size in mice.

Authors:  D S FALCONER; A ROBERTSON
Journal:  Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl       Date:  1956

2.  The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Analysis of responses in the thorax selection lines.

Authors:  M Bos; W Scharloo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. I. The phenotypic variance and its components.

Authors:  W Scharloo; M S Hoogmoed; A T Kuile
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Analysis of responses in the thorax selection lines.

Authors:  M Bos; W Scharloo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effects of artificial stabilizing selection on Drosophila populations subjected to directional selection for another trait.

Authors:  A G Imasheva; L A Zhivotovsky; O E Lazebny
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.