Literature DB >> 417369

Activating and anesthetic effects of general depressants.

B Sanders, S K Sharpless, A C Collins, G E McClearn, C Flanagan.   

Abstract

The long-sleep (LS) and short-sleep (SS) lines of mice were derived by selective breeding with respect to ethanol sleep time. We found that in current generations LS mice also have longer sleep times than SS mice to trichloroethanol and paraldehyde. Two subsequent experiments tested our hypothesis that mice that are relatively insensitive to the hypnotic effects of depressant drugs might be relatively activated by low doses of these drugs. Both experiments failed to support the hypothesis. First, although SS mice were more activated than LS mice by subhypnotic doses of paraldehyde, the lines did not differ in the degree of activation produced by low doses of trichloroethanol. Second, among mice from a genetically heterogeneous population (HS), there was no relation between the degree of activation induced by a low dose of ethanol and sensitivity to the hypnotic effects of a higher dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 417369     DOI: 10.1007/bf00431847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of excited phases after sedatives and tranquilizers.

Authors:  G W READ; W CUTTING; A FURST
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1960-06-23

2.  Sensitivity to low doses of ethanol and pentobarbital in mice selected for sensitivity to hypnotic doses of ethanol.

Authors:  B Sanders
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1976-04

3.  Differential effects of pentobarbital and ethanol in mice.

Authors:  A J Siemens; A W Chan
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1976-08-15       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  The effects of ethanol on cortical and subcortical electrical activity in cats.

Authors:  G Dolce; H Decker
Journal:  Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol       Date:  1972-05

5.  Electroencephalographic and other evidence for mixed depressant and stimulant actions of alcoholic beverages.

Authors:  H B Murphree
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1973-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  A comparison of the effects of alcohol on mice selectively bred for differences in ethanol sleep-time.

Authors:  W D Heston; V G Erwin; S M Anderson; H Robbins
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1974-01-16       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Ethanol and caffeine: a complex interaction with respect to locomotor activity and central catecholamines.

Authors:  B Waldeck
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974-04-23

8.  Effect of hypnotics on mice genetically selected for sensitivity to ethanol.

Authors:  V G Erwin; W D Heston; G E McClearn; R A Deitrich
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.533

  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Selected mouse lines, alcohol and behavior.

Authors:  T J Phillips; D J Feller; J C Crabbe
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-09-15

2.  Locomotor responses to benzodiazepines, barbiturates and ethanol in diazepam-sensitive (DS) and -resistant (DR) mice.

Authors:  T J Phillips; E J Gallaher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Evidence that the selectively bred long- and short-sleep mouse lines display common narcotic reactions to many depressants.

Authors:  H P Alpern; T D McIntyre
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Genetic analysis of sensitivity to ethanol-induced depression of motor activity and impairment of swimming in rats.

Authors:  M B Bass; D Lester
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 5.  Complex motor and sensorimotor functions of striatal and accumbens dopamine: involvement in instrumental behavior processes.

Authors:  J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Stimulant and depressant properties of sedative-hypnotics in mice selectively bred for differential sensitivity to ethanol.

Authors:  B C Dudek; M E Abbott; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Reinterpretation of the literature indicates differential sensitivities of long-sleep and short-sleep mice are not specific to alcohol.

Authors:  T D McIntyre; H P Alpern
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Distinctions among sedative, disinhibitory, and ataxic properties of ethanol in inbred and selectively bred mice.

Authors:  B C Dudek; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Differential sensitivity to ethanol, pentobarbital, and barbital in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats.

Authors:  J M Khanna; A D Lê; H Kalant; C Kim
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Evidence that genetic differences in habituation and GABAergic mechanisms may be related to sensitivity to ethanol and development of ethanol tolerance in mice.

Authors:  S Liljequist
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.