Literature DB >> 417332

Reproductive and social behavior of marmosets with special reference to captive breeding.

G Epple.   

Abstract

The field studies reviewed above raise some doubts about the laboratory concept of the extended family as the basic social unit of the Callithricidae. As Dawson [6] suggests, wild groups might more closely approximate artificial laboratory groups. They probably consist of a dominant, monogamous breeding pair, its dependent offspring and separate hierarchies of subdominant males and females who stay associated with the group for various lengths of time. Some of these subdominants might be offspring or relatives of the breeding pair. As the field studies show, these groups are more or less open to immigrants coming from other groups. They possibly tolerate transient relatives more easily and for longer periods of time than nonrelated individuals. In spite of the relative tolerance of wild groups towards strange conspecifics, it appears most practical to maintain laboratory breeders as families and remove the offspring after they have participated in the care of their younger siblings. In this way their reproductive capacities can be utilized as soon as their parental behavior has developed adequately. Moreover, possible losses caused by keeping nonrelated adults of the same sex together are avoided. As pointed out above, some species are very aggressive towards strange adult conspecifics and some seem to defend territories in the wild. It seems advisable therefore to house them in cages which provide a certain degree of isolation from neighboring groups. We have found this to be more important in S. fuscicollis than in C. jacchus, particularly in densely populated colony rooms. We therefore house our animals in cages which allow no visual contact with any other group, and by doing so have reduced the general level of excitement in the colony room. We believe that aggressive displays between groups are responsible for a large amount of redirected aggression between mates and for some of the abortions we have seen in our colony. Moreover, Rothe's [28, 29] observation that the parturient female withdraws from her group and gives birth in relative isolation should be taken into consideration when designing breeding cages. Although not all individuals of all species might show this behavior [see 32] it seems to be widespread enough to be an important factor in breeding efficiency and might figure in some of the infanticides observed by us and other authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 417332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Primates Med        ISSN: 0079-5119


  4 in total

1.  Hormonal and experiential predictors of infant survivorship and maternal behavior in a monogamous primate (Callicebus cupreus).

Authors:  Michael R Jarcho; Sally P Mendoza; Karen L Bales
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Cooperative breeders do cooperate.

Authors:  Charles T Snowdon; Katherine A Cronin
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Nonhuman Primate Paternal Care: Species and Individual Differences in Behavior and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Toni E Ziegler; Stacey R Tecot; Eduardo Fernandez-Duque; Anne Savage; Charles T Snowdon
Journal:  Adv Neurobiol       Date:  2022

4.  Strongly bonded family members in common marmosets show synchronized fluctuations in oxytocin.

Authors:  Christa Finkenwirth; Carel van Schaik; Toni E Ziegler; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-07-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.