Literature DB >> 416759

To pulse or not to pulse.

C Mavroudis.   

Abstract

Pulsatile and nonpulsatile blood flow have been intensely studied for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), isolated organ perfusion, and myocardial preservation. Although early studies differed, later ones have shown the benefits of pulsatile flow. Kidney function, lymph flow, and oxygen consumption are increased during pulsatile perfusion. Also, nonpulsatile CPB increases total peripheral resistance and mean arterial pressure, which are related to time of perfusion. Theories to account for the superiority of pulsatile flow include: (1) "vascular shocks" causing physical displacement of tissues, which changes the boundary layer of interstitial fluid around cell membranes and enhances diffusion ;(2) increased lymph movement during pulsatile flow; and (3) pulsatile energy ensuring the patency of the vascular beds and preventing shunting. New methods to create pulsatile flow and their adaptation to the standard roller pump are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 416759     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63539-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Pulmonary and caval flow dynamics after total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  K Houlind; E V Stenbøg; K E Sørensen; K Emmertsen; O K Hansen; L Rybro; V E Hjortdal
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Pulsatile reperfusion after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome.

Authors:  M P Anstadt; M J Stonnington; M Tedder; B J Crain; M F Brothers; D J Hilleren; R J Rahija; J A Menius; J E Lowe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Experimental results and future prospects for a nonpulsatile cardiac prosthesis.

Authors:  R Yozu; L A Golding; G Jacobs; H Harasaki; Y Nose
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the pharmacokinetics of drugs.

Authors:  F O Holley; K V Ponganis; D R Stanski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Myocardial protection during revascularization for myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A S Wechsler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Perioperative stroke. Part II: Cardiac surgery and cardiogenic embolic stroke.

Authors:  D H Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Pulmonary and caval blood flow patterns in patients with intracardiac and extracardiac Fontan: a magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  K Klimes; H Abdul-Khaliq; S Ovroutski; W Hui; V Alexi-Meskishvili; B Spors; R Hetzer; R Felix; P E Lange; F Berger; M Gutberlet
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Renal autoregulation: new perspectives regarding the protective and regulatory roles of the underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Rodger Loutzenhiser; Karen Griffin; Geoffrey Williamson; Anil Bidani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Suzanne Davey; Erik A Maus; Renie Guilliod; Harvey N Mayrovitz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Dependence of brain intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion parameters on the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Christian Federau; Patric Hagmann; Philippe Maeder; Markus Müller; Reto Meuli; Matthias Stuber; Kieran O'Brien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.