Literature DB >> 416198

The reinforcing properties of procaine and d-amphetamine compared in rhesus monkeys.

D M Hammerbeck, C L Mitchell.   

Abstract

Twelve rhesus monkeys were studied under a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule of intravenous procaine or d-amphetamine injection from 8 A.M. to 4 P.M. daily. Under the FR schedule, every nth lever press produced an injection. The FR value (n) and the dose per injection of procaine and d-amphetamine were varied systematically. At a FR value of 10, responding was maintained by doses of procaine ranging from 0.125 to 12 mg/kg/injection and by doses of d-amphetamine ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 mg/kg/injection. At doses of 1 mg/kg/injection of procaine and 0.1 mg/kg/injection of d-amphetamine, responding was maintained at FR values up to 100 by procaine and d-amphetamine but not by saline. Responding and drug intake were relatively constant throughout each 8-hour session with procaine, but responding tended to decrease and was more variable over the session with d-amphetamine. No toxic effects were observed in doses up to 6 mg/kg/injection with procaine. At this dose, eating and drinking ceased during the period of access to the drug. One of the four monkeys died at 8 mg/kg/injection of procaine. At 12 mg/kg/injection all three monkeys tested showed signs of toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 416198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  8 in total

1.  Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure.

Authors:  M A Nader; W L Woolverton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; M P Layng; G Badger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Cocaine cue in pigeons: time course studies and generalization to structurally related compounds (norcocaine, WIN 35,428 and 35,065-2) and (+)-amphetamine.

Authors:  T U Järbe
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  The reinforcing properties of procaine, chloroprocaine and proparacaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  C E Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Cocaine and local anesthetics: stimulant activity in rats with nigral lesions.

Authors:  P B Silverman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of procaine, dimethocaine and lidocaine in rats.

Authors:  J H Graham; R L Balster
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Predicting abuse potential of stimulants and other dopaminergic drugs: overview and recommendations.

Authors:  Sally L Huskinson; Jennifer E Naylor; James K Rowlett; Kevin B Freeman
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.