Literature DB >> 411878

Allotype-specific analysis of anti-(Tyr,Glu)-Ala-Lys antibodies produced by Ir-1A high and low responder chimeric mice.

J L Press, H O McDevitt.   

Abstract

Katz et al. (1) have demonstrated a restriction in lymphoid cell interaction when the antigen used is under immune response (Ir) gene control. T cells from (low responder x high responder) F(1) mice primed to the terpolymer L-glutamic acid, L-lysine, L-tyrosine (GLT) can collaborate with 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-primed B cells from the Ir-GLT high responder but not low responder strain in response to DNP-GLT (1). In contrast are the studies of Bechtol et al. and Bechtol and McDevitt (2,3), who examined the antibody responses of tetraparental mice immunized with the synthetic polypeptide poly-L(Tyr,Glu)-poly D,L-Ala- poly-L-Lys ((T,G)-A-L), an antigen under Ir-1A genetic control. Several tetraparental mice produced anti(T-,G)-A-L antibody of low responder strain immunoglobulin (Ig) allotype (2,3). These results indicated that he Ir-1A gene was not expressed in B cells and implied that interactions among genetically dissimilar cell populations could occur when tolerance existed to H-2 antigenic differences. Recent studies with bone marrow cell chimeric mice have shown that chimeric T cells can interact with H-2 histoincompatible B cells in response to antigens not under Ir gene control (4-6). To clarify whether lymphoid cell chimerism, with presumed tolerance to H-2 incompatibility, would permit effective cell interactions in response to antigens under Ir gene control, bone marrow cell chimeric mice were prepared by using strains differing both for Ig allotype and for high versus low responsiveness to (T,G)-A-L. An antigen-specific and allotype- specific antibody assay was used to discriminate the responses produced by high and low responder strain B cells in these chimeras. The results suggest that lymphoid cell chimerism per se is not sufficient to obviate Ir gene-mediated restriction in cell interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 411878      PMCID: PMC2181890          DOI: 10.1084/jem.146.6.1815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  7 in total

1.  Cooperation across the histocompatibility barrier.

Authors:  H Waldmann; H Pope; A J Munro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Antibody response of C3H in equilibrium (CKB X CWB)F1 tetraparental mice to poly-L(Tyr,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala-poly-L-Lys immunization.

Authors:  K B Bechtol; H O McDevitt
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

3.  Assessing B cell diversification by antigen receptor and precursor cell analysis.

Authors:  N R Klinman; A R Pickard; N H Sigal; P J Gearhart; E S Metcalf; S K Pierce
Journal:  Ann Immunol (Paris)       Date:  1976 Jun-Jul

4.  Collaboration of histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes using cells from tetraparental bone marrow chimeras.

Authors:  H von Boehmer; L Hudson; J Sprent
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1975-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Tolerance to histocompatibility determinants in tetraparental bone marrow chimeras.

Authors:  H Boehmer; J Sprent; M Nabholz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1975-02-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Genetic control of the antibody response to poly-L(Tyr,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala--poly-L-Lys in C3H--CWB tetraparental mice.

Authors:  K B Bechtol; J H Freed; L A Herzenberg; H O McDevitt
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. IV. Involvement of the immune response (Ir) gene in the control of lymphocyte interactions in responses controlled by the gene.

Authors:  D H Katz; T Hamaoka; M E Dorf; P H Maurer; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  The early history of Stanford Immunology.

Authors:  Patricia P Jones; Leonore A Herzenberg
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 2.  T cell recognition of antigen in vivo: role of the H-2 complex.

Authors:  J Sprent; R Korngold; K Molnar-Kimber
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1980-08

3.  Immune response genes controlling responsiveness to major transplantation antigens. Specific major histocompatibility complex-linked defect for antibody responses to class I alloantigens.

Authors:  G W Butcher; J R Corvalán; D R Licence; J C Howard
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

4.  Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. I. Both T and B lymphocytes differentiating in F1 transplanted to parental chimeras manifest preferential cooperative activity for partner lymphocytes derived from the same parental type corresponding to the chimeric host.

Authors:  D H Katz; B J Skidmore; L R Katz; C A Bogowitz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. IV (Responder x nonresponder) F1 T cells can be taught to preferentially help nonresponder, rather than responder, B cells.

Authors:  D H Katz; L R Katz; C A Bogowitz; P H Maurer
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  In irradiation chimeras, K or D regions of the chimeric host, not of the donor lymphocytes, determine immune responsiveness of antiviral cytotoxic T cells.

Authors:  R M Zinkernagel; A Althage; S Cooper; G Callahan; J Klein
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  The immune response of allophenic mice to 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-bovine gamma globulin. I. Allotype analysis of anti-DNP antibody.

Authors:  C M Warner; T J Berntson; L Eakley; J L McIvor; R C Newton
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.