Literature DB >> 411797

Differences in vitro between fibroblast-like cells from cornea, heart, and skin of embryonic chicks.

G W Conrad, G W Hart, Y Chen.   

Abstract

Populations of fibroblast-like cells of corneal stroma, heart ventricle, and back skin of day-14 embryonic chicks were grown in vitro as primary and secondary cultures and were found to differ from one another by several criteria. Such cells were obtained from tissues either directly (cornea) by dissection or indirectly (heart and skin) by the rapid adhesion of the fibroblast-like cells to glass and plastic substrata. Individual fibroblast-like cells of cornea and heart were distinguishable from one another during their first 24--48 h in vitro. The morphologies of the individual cels of these 2 populations became indistinguishable during logarithmic growth, although each could be distinguished from individual fibroblast-like cells of skin. When the cultures reached saturation, corneal cells formed a monolayer of randomly oriented polygonal cells; skin cells formed a monolayer of long, narrow, ragged cells in parallel arrays with occasional double-layering; and heart cells formed multilayers of criss-crossed cells whose broad, smooth outlines were in parallel array in each layer. Saturation densities of the 3 fibroblast-like populations were different: heart greater than skin greater than cornea. By 3 methods of assay the cells were found to be differentially sensitive to treatment with trypsin and EDTA, and to EDTA alone, heart cells consistently being the least sensitive. Taken together, these data suggest that fibroblast-like cell populations isolated from different tissues of a single organism are different from one another and thus may behave differently from one another during in vitro studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 411797     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.26.1.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  8 in total

1.  Phenotypic responses to mechanical stress in fibroblasts from tendon, cornea and skin.

Authors:  Jennifer R Mackley; Joji Ando; Pawel Herzyk; Steven J Winder
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Analysis of the role of microfilaments and microtubules in acquisition of bipolarity and elongation of fibroblasts in hydrated collagen gels.

Authors:  J J Tomasek; E D Hay
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Attachment and extracellular matrix differences between tendon and synovial fibroblastic cells.

Authors:  M A Riederer-Henderson; A Gauger; L Olson; C Robertson; T K Greenlee
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1983-02

4.  Characterisation of fibroblast-like cells in pannus lesions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis sharing properties of fibroblasts and chondrocytes.

Authors:  C Xue; M Takahashi; T Hasunuma; H Aono; K Yamamoto; S Yoshino; T Sumida; K Nishioka
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Collagen-type synthesis in human-hair papilla cells in culture.

Authors:  K Katsuoka; C Mauch; H Schell; O P Hornstein; T Krieg
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Isolation and growth characteristics of adult human tendon fibroblasts.

Authors:  M D Chard; J K Wright; B L Hazleman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Synthesis of type III collagen by fibroblasts from the embryonic chick cornea.

Authors:  G W Conrad; W Dessau; K von der Mark
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Adhesive multiplicity in the interaction of embryonic fibroblasts and myoblasts with extracellular matrices.

Authors:  C Decker; R Greggs; K Duggan; J Stubbs; A Horwitz
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.