Literature DB >> 4103277

Prevention of Rh-haemolytic disease: results of the Liverpool "low-risk" clinical trial.

J C Woodrow, C A Clarke, R B McConnell, S H Towers, W T Donohoe.   

Abstract

A clinical trial is reported in which Rh-negative primiparae, just delivered of an Rh-positive ABO-compatible infant and in whom fetal cell counts after delivery suggested less than 0.2 ml of circulating fetal blood, were treated with about 200 mug of anti-D gammaglobulin. Three (0.36%) out of 844 women thus treated developed anti-D in the subsequent six months; this is 10% of the incidence in untreated controls. Three (1.8%) out of 171 treated mothers had anti-D at the end of the second Rh-positive pregnancy, and this is 18% of the incidence in controls.Possible reasons for the occasional failure of the treatment are discussed and the results of this trial are compared with those of a previous trial in which 1,000 mug or more of anti-D was given to a different group of mothers. The combined results of the two trials lead to the conclusion that the passive administration of anti-D gammaglobulin after delivery affords in this population of Rh-negative women a 95% protection rate in the postdelivery period and an 89% protection rate by the end of the subsequent pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1971        PMID: 4103277      PMCID: PMC1796483          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5762.610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  7 in total

1.  [Demonstration of fetal hemoglobin in erythrocytes of a blood smear].

Authors:  E KLEIHAUER; H BRAUN; K BETKE
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1957-06-15

2.  The pathogenesis and prevention of Rh immunization.

Authors:  A Zipursky; L G Israels
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-11-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Significance of Rh-sensitization during pregnancy: its relation to a preventive programme.

Authors:  J C Godel; D I Buchanan; J M Jarosch; M McHugh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-11-23

4.  Use of different doses of anti-Rh IgG in the prevention of Rh isoimmunisation.

Authors:  D I Buchanan; R E Bell; R P Beck; W C Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Rapid clearance of Rh positive blood during experimental Rh immunisation.

Authors:  J C Woodrow; R Finn; J R Krevans
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Suppression of primary RH immunization by passively-administered antibody. Experiments in volunteers.

Authors:  P L Mollison; N C Hughes-Jones; M Lindsay; J Wessely
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Prevention of haemolytic disease of the newborn.

Authors:  J M Bowman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 6.998

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  The history of rhesus prophylaxis with anti-D.

Authors:  A Wegmann; R Glück
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Preventing rhesus babies: the Liverpool research and follow up.

Authors:  C A Clarke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Prevention of Rh haemolytic disease: the present position.

Authors:  C A Clarke
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1972-02

4.  Prevention of Rh-haemolytic disease: final results of the "high-risk" clinical trial. A combined study from centres in England and Baltimore.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-06-12

5.  Rh prevention: a report and analysis of a national programme.

Authors:  J Eklund; H R Nevanlinna
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Editorial: Suppression of Rh-sensitisation by the use of anti-D immunoglobulin.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-10

7.  The risk of Rh isoimmunization in ruptured tubal pregnancy.

Authors:  J Katz; R G Marcus
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-09-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.