Literature DB >> 4096910

Contingent negative variation in processes of expectancy, motor preparation and time estimation.

F Macar, M Besson.   

Abstract

The contingent Negative Variation (CNV) was compared in four paradigms inducing distinct processes. All paradigms comprised empty intervals of 4 sec bounded by two 100 msec stimuli (S1 and S2) or by S1 and the response (a button press). In paradigm ID (Intensity Discrimination), the S1-S2 interval was followed, after another delay, by a choice response depending on the intensity of S2. In paradigm RT (Reaction Time), the S1-S2 interval was followed by a simple reaction time. In paradigm TP (Time Production), the subjects had to produce a response 4 sec after S1. In paradigm TR (Time Reproduction), the duration of the S1-S2 interval was estimated by the subjects and was to be reproduced after S2. Electrodes were placed on Cz, Fz and Pz in 12 human subjects. The largest CNVs were obtained in paradigm TR. Motor preparation before S2 had no effect on CNV amplitude. Discussion focuses upon the relations between CNV, temporal processes and activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4096910     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(85)90184-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  5 in total

1.  Anticipatory attention to verbal and non-verbal stimuli is reflected in a modality-specific SPN.

Authors:  C H M Brunia; G J M van Boxtel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Expectation and attention in hierarchical auditory prediction.

Authors:  Srivas Chennu; Valdas Noreika; David Gueorguiev; Alejandro Blenkmann; Silvia Kochen; Agustín Ibáñez; Adrian M Owen; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity (SPN) prior to feedback stimuli.

Authors:  K B Böcker; C H Brunia; M M van den Berg-Lenssen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation.

Authors:  R Frömer; H Lin; C K Dean Wolf; M Inzlicht; A Shenhav
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Kolaviron via anti-inflammatory and redox regulatory mechanisms abates multi-walled carbon nanotubes-induced neurobehavioral deficits in rats.

Authors:  Isaac A Adedara; Ifeoluwa O Awogbindin; Olatunde Owoeye; Ikenna C Maduako; Akinola O Ajeleti; Solomon E Owumi; Anita K Patlolla; Ebenezer O Farombi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.