Literature DB >> 4096697

Noncomplementation phenomena and their bearing on nondisjunctional effects.

A G Searle, C V Beechey.   

Abstract

In the mouse, unbalanced gametes with major gains and/or losses of chromosomal material seem just as capable of forming a zygote as normal, fully balanced gametes. This is shown by the results of intercrossing genetically marked translocation heterozygotes, in which complementary unbalanced gametes usually fuse to form fully viable zygotes. However, there are some notable exceptions to this. Studies on a number of reciprocal translocations have shown that gametes with maternal duplication of particular chromosome regions may fail to complement those with a corresponding paternal deficiency, but produce lethal zygotes instead, whereas the reciprocal combination of a paternal duplication with a maternal deficiency produces fully viable offspring. For a particular distal region on chromosome 7 the reverse situation holds. More recent studies on genetic methods of detecting nondisjunction with Robertsonian translocations have revealed the same phenomenon. Mouse chromosomes affected include numbers 2, 6, 7, and 8. There is also defective complementation on chromosome 11 and related phenomena on chromosome 17. These findings help to explain why diploid embryos with 2 male or 2 female pronuclei fail to come to term and may be connected with genetic imprinting of gametes. It seems probable that the same phenomenon occurs in homologous regions of human chromosomes and may mean that the severity of a trisomic effect will depend sometimes on the parental source of the extra chromosome. The phenomenon also affects the efficiency of certain genetic tests for nondisjunction which depend on full complementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4096697     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2127-9_25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Life Sci        ISSN: 0090-5542


  6 in total

1.  Cytogenetic analysis of 750 spontaneous abortions with the direct-preparation method of chorionic villi and its implications for studying genetic causes of pregnancy wastage.

Authors:  B Eiben; I Bartels; S Bähr-Porsch; S Borgmann; G Gatz; G Gellert; R Goebel; W Hammans; M Hentemann; R Osmers
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Genomic imprinting: review and relevance to human diseases.

Authors:  J G Hall
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Can molecular imprinting explain heterozygote deficiency and hybrid vigor?

Authors:  R Chakraborty
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nondisjunction rates and abnormal embryonic development in a mouse cross between heterozygotes carrying a (7, 18) robertsonian translocation chromosome.

Authors:  R J Oakey; P G Matteson; S Litwin; S M Tilghman; R L Nussbaum
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease.

Authors:  J E Spence; R G Perciaccante; G M Greig; H F Willard; D H Ledbetter; J F Hejtmancik; M S Pollack; W E O'Brien; A L Beaudet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genomic imprinting: a possible mechanism for the parental origin effect in Huntington's chorea.

Authors:  W Reik
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.