Literature DB >> 4093881

Potential-dependent variations of the intracellular pressure in the intracellularly perfused squid giant axon.

S Terakawa.   

Abstract

Intracellular pressure responses were recorded from squid giant axons after the axoplasm was removed by the intracellular perfusion technique. A glass tube was inserted into the axon and the movement of the air-water interface formed on the end of the tube was observed with a Y-shaped fibrescope. The intracellular pressure increased and decreased rapidly when an action potential was induced by electrical stimulation. The amplitude of the response was about 10 mPa (or 1 X 10(-3) mmH2O), which was very large in comparison with that observed in unperfused axons. It was sensitive to extracellular Ca2+. The pressure response appeared in an all-or-none manner and could be suppressed by tetrodotoxin. This excluded physicochemical processes on the stimulating electrode or current-supplying electrode as sources of the response. Various other sources of artifacts were also excluded. An extensive removal of the axoplasm by intracellular perfusion with a protease-containing solution and a KCl solution did not eliminate the pressure response. The intracellular pressure was membrane potential dependent, increasing upon depolarization and decreasing upon hyperpolarization of the membrane. Under voltage clamp, the relationship between the membrane potential and the pressure response was parabolic with a maximum at +109 mV (in reference to the resting level). The response did not depend on the membrane current. A much slower response due to electro-osmotic water flow was also detected. The pressure response induced by hyperpolarization of the membrane was suppressed by extracellular application of a lidocaine-containing solution, but not by a tetrodotoxin-containing solution. These results suggest that the pressure responses arise either from a change in electrostriction across the axolemma or from a change in charge-dependent tension along the axolemma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4093881      PMCID: PMC1192646          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  34 in total

1.  Replacement of the axoplasm of giant nerve fibres with artificial solutions.

Authors:  P F BAKER; A L HODGKIN; T I SHAW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Alteration of birefringence signals from squid giant axons by intracellular perfusion with protease solution.

Authors:  A Watanabe; S Terakawa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1976-07-15

Review 3.  Changes in neuron structure during action potential propagation and synaptic transmission.

Authors:  L B Cohen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Laser interferometer measurement of changes in crayfish axon diameter concurrent with action potential.

Authors:  B C Hill; E D Schubert; M A Nokes; R P Michelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Membrane-associated cytoskeletal proteins in squid giant axons.

Authors:  J Baumgold; S Ierakawa; K Iwasa; H Gainer
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  Changes in intracellular pressure in squid giant axons associated with production of action potentials.

Authors:  S Terakawa
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Voltage-dependent capacitance in lipid bilayers made from monolayers.

Authors:  O Alvarez; R Latorre
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Mechanical changes in crab nerve fibers during action potentials.

Authors:  I Tasaki; K Iwasa; R C Gibbons
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1980

9.  Role of divalent cations in excitation of squid giant axons.

Authors:  I Tasaki; A Watanabe; L Lerman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1967-12

10.  Analysis of the potential-dependent changes in optical retardation in the squid giant axon.

Authors:  L B Cohen; B Hille; R D Keynes; D Landowne; E Rojas
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interfacial models of nerve fiber cytoskeleton.

Authors:  V V Malev; D B Gromov; M S Brudnaya
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  J F Ashmore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cell Surface Deformation during an Action Potential.

Authors:  Christian Fillafer; Matan Mussel; Julia Muchowski; Matthias F Schneider
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Polarity reversal of the optical rotation signals with change in direction of impulse conduction along the lobster nerve.

Authors:  A Watanabe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Voltage-dependent capacitance of human embryonic kidney cells.

Authors:  Brenda Farrell; Cythnia Do Shope; William E Brownell
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-04-28

6.  Mechanical characterization of squid giant axon membrane sheath and influence of the collagenous endoneurium on its properties.

Authors:  Annaclaudia Montanino; Astrid Deryckere; Nele Famaey; Eve Seuntjens; Svein Kleiven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety.

Authors:  Joseph Blackmore; Shamit Shrivastava; Jerome Sallet; Chris R Butler; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Acoustic Waves in Axonal Membrane and Caveolins are the New Targets for Pain Treatment with High Frequency Ultrasound.

Authors:  Ilja Kruglikov
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.