Literature DB >> 4091959

Grasping in the pigeon (Columba livia): final common path mechanisms.

B G Klein, J D Deich, H P Zeigler.   

Abstract

A combination of cinematographic and denervation procedures were used to analyse the mechanisms involved in the adjustment of gape size during grasping in the pigeon. Gape size was found to vary directly with seed size and to reflect the operation of two variables, jaw opening velocity and jaw opening duration. Effects upon duration are mediated, indirectly, by the effect of seed size upon head height, which, in turn, controls the velocity of head descent. The data suggest that the control of gape during grasping may involve two different effector systems (jaw muscles, neck muscles). Analysis of the displacement of individual jaws (maxilla, mandible) during grasping indicates that both opener muscles take part in the control of gape. Denervation experiments (motor nerve section) identified these opener motoneurons as contributors to the final common path for the opening phase of grasping. A comparison of the kinematics of pecking/grasping in pigeons and reaching/grasping in humans reveals a number of similarities in the topography and spatiotemporal organization of these behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4091959     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Prehension in the pigeon. II. Kinematic analysis.

Authors:  R Bermejo; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissecting the conditioned pecking response: an integrated system for the analysis of pecking response parameters.

Authors:  R Bermejo; D Houben; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches.

Authors:  Peter Balsam; Hugo Sanchez-Castillo; Kathleen Taylor; Heather Van Volkinburg; Ryan D Ward
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Prehension in the pigeon. I. Descriptive analysis.

Authors:  R Bermejo; R W Allan; A D Houben; J D Deich; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Sowing the seeds of intentionality: Motor intentions in plants.

Authors:  Qiuran Wang; Silvia Guerra; Francesco Ceccarini; Bianca Bonato; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2021-08-04

6.  Flexible motor adjustment of pecking with an artificially extended bill in crows but not in pigeons.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsui; Ei-Ichi Izawa
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Flexible control of movement in plants.

Authors:  Silvia Guerra; Alessandro Peressotti; Francesca Peressotti; Maria Bulgheroni; Walter Baccinelli; Enrico D'Amico; Alejandra Gómez; Stefano Massaccesi; Francesco Ceccarini; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Can Plants Move Like Animals? A Three-Dimensional Stereovision Analysis of Movement in Plants.

Authors:  Valentina Simonetti; Maria Bulgheroni; Silvia Guerra; Alessandro Peressotti; Francesca Peressotti; Walter Baccinelli; Francesco Ceccarini; Bianca Bonato; Qiuran Wang; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.