Literature DB >> 4089518

Reproducibility and diagnostic value of Hemoccult-II test. A colonoscopic evaluation in asymptomatic patients.

S Adamsen, O Kronborg, E Hage, C Fenger.   

Abstract

Inter-observer agreement rate in double readings of 246 Hemoccult-II tests was 0.88 (Kappa analysis). The slides were not rehydrated. The Hemoccult-II test was performed immediately before 748 total colonoscopies in asymptomatic patients after previous polypectomy or radical surgery for cancer to estimate the diagnostic value of the test in mass screening, accepting a higher prevalence of neoplasia in the study group but realizing that colonoscopy can only be performed in high-risk groups. Another purpose was to investigate the possibility of replacing colonoscopy with Hemoccult-II in surveillance after previous adenoma or cancer. The 79 colonoscopies after a positive test showed cancer in 3, adenomas in 13, and other intestinal pathology in 34 cases. The 669 colonoscopies after negative tests showed cancer in 1, adenomas in 67, and other pathology in 141 cases. In conclusion, the test cannot be used as a guideline for colonoscopy in follow-up programs for patients who have had adenomas, since it missed 84% of the new cases in the present series. The test does not exclude the presence of colorectal carcinoma, but the risk of cancer is probably several times less in patients with negative tests (1 of 669) than in patients with positive tests (3 of 79), which may justify the use of the Hemoccult-II test for mass screening in asymptomatic populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4089518     DOI: 10.3109/00365528509088874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  4 in total

Review 1.  The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 2.  Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Windeler; J Köbberling
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Screening of average-risk individuals for colorectal cancer. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer; J St John; J Bond; J D Hardcastle; O Kronborg; B Flehinger; D Schottenfeld; N N Blinov
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Adenomas and hyperplastic polyps in screening studies.

Authors:  K Bech; O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.