Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test.

Literature DB >> 4086970

Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test.

Abstract

A commonly used estimate of a screening test's sensitivity, based on the prevalence at screening and the incidence of interval cancers, is shown to be logically unsound and quantitatively poor. An alternative simple estimate is proposed, based only on incidence rates.

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 1985 PMID： 4086970 PMCID： PMC1052473 DOI： 10.1136/jech.39.4.364

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health ISSN： 0143-005X Impact factor: 3.710

3 in total

1. Estimation of the duration of a pre-clinical disease state using screening data.

Authors: S D Walter; N E Day
Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1983-12 Impact factor: 4.897

2. Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors: N E Day; S D Walter
Journal: Biometrics Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 2.571

3. Repeated screening for breast cancer.

Authors: J Chamberlain; R E Clifford; B E Nathan; J L Price; I Burn
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 3.710

3 in total

19 in total

Review 1. Design of cancer screening trials/randomized trials for evaluation of cancer screening.

Authors: Anthony B Miller
Journal: World J Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2. Current issues and future perspectives of gastric cancer screening.

Authors: Chisato Hamashima
Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3. Benefits and harms of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.

Authors: Chisato Hamashima
Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.742

4. False negative rate in cervical cytology.

Authors: Y van der Graaf; G P Vooijs
Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 1987-04 Impact factor: 3.411

5. Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: a comparison of different methods.

Authors: C T Brekelmans; P Westers; J A Faber; P H Peeters; H J Collette
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 3.710

6. Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors: P G Peer; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 1996 Impact factor: 4.872

7. Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot.

Authors: S M Moss; C Campbell; J Melia; D Coleman; S Smith; R Parker; P Ramsell; J Patnick; D P Weller
Journal: Gut Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 23.059

8. Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 years.

Authors: S Moss; I Thomas; A Evans; B Thomas; L Johns
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-03-14 Impact factor: 7.640

9. Comparison of a guaiac and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test for the detection of colonic lesions according to lesion type and location.

Authors: L Guittet; V Bouvier; N Mariotte; J P Vallee; R Levillain; J Tichet; G Launoy
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 7.640

10. Sensitivity and specificity of lung cancer screening using chest low-dose computed tomography.

Authors: Y Toyoda; T Nakayama; Y Kusunoki; H Iso; T Suzuki
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 7.640