Literature DB >> 4084873

Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during surgery of skull base tumours.

F Gentili, W M Lougheed, K Yamashiro, C Corrado.   

Abstract

Despite advances in instrumentation and the use of microsurgical techniques, neurosurgical procedures involving extensive areas of skull base or other critical areas of brain still carry significant risk for neurological injury. The use of intraoperative recording of sensory evoked potentials (SEP) has been advocated to monitor neurologic function during these major neurosurgical procedures to reduce the risk of injury to neural structures. This report summarizes our experience with intraoperative monitoring of SEP in over 200 patients, and details our findings in a group of 12 patients with skull base and posterior fossa tumours. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were monitored in all patients, and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) in five. While minor changes in BAEP and SSEP parameters were noted in most patients, significant changes occurred in five. Irreversible loss of BAEP in one patient was associated with complete hearing loss postoperatively. Marked, persistent alteration of both BAEP and SSEP was associated with postoperative brainstem dysfunction. No patient with stable BAEP and SSEP at the end of the procedure suffered additional neurological deficit. We conclude that intraoperative SEP monitoring may be valuable in minimizing neural injury during major neurosurgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4084873     DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100035484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0317-1671            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

Review 1.  Skull-base metastases.

Authors:  Florence Laigle-Donadey; Sophie Taillibert; Nadine Martin-Duverneuil; Jerzy Hildebrand; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. I. Technical principles, applicability and limitations.

Authors:  J Schramm; E Watanabe; C Strauss; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Somatosensory evoked potentials and intracranial pressure during chronic dilatation of an artificial extraparenchymal space-occupying lesion in cats.

Authors:  H W Bothe; S W Lee; M Samii
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Predictive Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Resection of Intraparenchymal and Intraventricular Tumors Using an Endoscopic Port.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Thirumala; Daniel Lai; Jonathan Engh; Miguel Habeych; Donald Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  The prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring and tumor data in supratentorial tumor removal.

Authors:  A Witzmann; H Beran; H Böhm-Jurkovic; W Löffler
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-04

Review 6.  Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base: A Technical Guide.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Richard W Vogel; Robert M Lober; Adam T Doan; Craig I Matsumoto; Tyler J Kenning; James J Evans
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.