Literature DB >> 408468

Tissue reactions to long-term electrical stimulation of the cerebellum in monkeys.

W J Brown, T L Babb, H V Soper, J P Lieb, C A Ottino, P H Crandall.   

Abstract

Light and electron microscopic analyses were carried out on the stimulated and unstimulated paravermal cortices of six rhesus monkeys that had electrodes implanted on their cerebella for 2 months. The electrodes and the stimulation regime (10 p.p.s.: 8 min on, 8 min off) were similar to those used to stimulate the human cerebellum for treatment of certain neurological disorders. Mere presence of the electrode array in the posterior fossa for 2 months resulted in some meningeal thickening, attenuation of the molecular layer, and loss of Purkinje cells immediately beneath the electrode array. There was no evidence of scarring. After 205 hours of stimulation (7.35 X 10(6) pulses) over 18 days, a charge of 0.5 muC/ph or estimated charge density of 7.4 muC/sq cm/ph resulted in no damage to the cerebellum attributable to electrical stimulation per se. Such a charge/phase is about five times the threshold for evocation of cerebellar efferent activity, and might be considered "safe" for stimulation of human cerebellum. Charge density/phase and charge/phase were directly related to increased cerebellar injury in the six other cerebellar cortices stimulated. Leptomeningeal thickening increased with increased charge density. Injury included severe molecular layer attenuation, ongoing destruction of Purkinje cells, gliosis, ongoing degeneration of myelinated axons, collagen intrusion, and increased levels of local polysaccharides. In all cases, even with damage that destroyed all conducting elements beneath the electrodes, there was no damage further than 1 to 2 mm from the edges of the electrode arrays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 408468     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1977.47.3.0366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  13 in total

1.  Ultrastructural changes in the septum of the cat brain with prolonged self-stimulation.

Authors:  E I Dzamoeva; I L Lazriev; G I Kiknadze; N V Abashidze
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

2.  Chronic implanting of electrodes in the cerebellar vermis of the cat. Morphological findings.

Authors:  J Vaquero; A P Lozano; S Oya; M Manrique; G Bravo
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Biopsy and post-mortem findings in a patient receiving cerebellar stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  G D Wright; R O Weller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Tissue damage after chronic cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  J Vaquero; M Manrique; S Oya; G Bravo
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  M S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

6.  Monitoring of direct cortical responses during temporary arterial occlusion at aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  S Fujita; T Kawaguchi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 7.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Kip A Ludwig; Cristin G Welle; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Bionic intrafascicular interfaces for recording and stimulating peripheral nerve fibers.

Authors:  Ranu Jung; James J Abbas; Sathyakumar Kuntaegowdanahalli; Anil K Thota
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-14

9.  Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Electrochemical safety limits for clinical stimulation investigated using depth and strip electrodes in the pig brain.

Authors:  Ritwik Vatsyayan; Daniel Cleary; Joel R Martin; Eric Halgren; Shadi A Dayeh
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.