Literature DB >> 4078105

Does biopsy type influence survival in clinical stage I cutaneous melanoma?

J S Lederman, A J Sober.   

Abstract

A total of 472 patients with clinical Stage I cutaneous melanoma were analyzed to determine influence of type of diagnostic biopsy on survival. Of these patients, 119 had had an incisional biopsy (either punch or incision) and 353 had an excisional biopsy. Patients were grouped by thickness category and outcome compared between the biopsy types. Within each thickness category, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups. The observation that none of the seventy-six patients with primary tumors less than 1.70 mm have died following incisional biopsy strongly argues against any deleterious effect of incisional biopsy in this group. Alternatively, if the two highest-risk groups (greater than or equal to 1.70 mm) are analyzed as a single group, an adverse effect is seen in the incisional biopsy group (p less than 0.05). However, when the data from these groups are subjected to multivariate analysis, biopsy type is not a significant factor in the model. This study shows that either biopsy method may be used in first evaluating patients with suspected melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4078105     DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70249-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  19 in total

1.  Anchors away.

Authors:  R P Usatine
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  The detection and management of dysplastic nevi and early melanoma.

Authors:  J K Rivers
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Current biopsy practices for suspected melanoma: A survey of family physicians in Southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Kristina Lutz; Victoria Hayward; Mariamma Joseph; Eric Wong; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Diagnosis of malignant melanoma by general practitioners and hospital specialists.

Authors:  A M Jackson; D R Morgan; R Ellison
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Mucosal malignant melanomas in head and neck surgery: a retrospective study of six patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Astrid L D Kruse; Marc O Riener; Klaus W Graetz; Heinz-Theo Luebbers
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09

6.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  [Melanoma: introduction and special demands on radiology].

Authors:  M Schiller; J C Hassel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Guidelines of the Brazilian Dermatology Society for diagnosis, treatment and follow up of primary cutaneous melanoma--Part I.

Authors:  Luiz Guilherme Martins Castro; Maria Cristina Messina; Walter Loureiro; Ricardo Silvestre Macarenco; João Pedreira Duprat Neto; Thais Helena Bello Di Giacomo; Flávia Vasques Bittencourt; Renato Marchiori Bakos; Sérgio Schrader Serpa; Hamilton Ometto Stolf; Gabriel Gontijo
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

9.  Excision biopsy of malignant melanoma by general practitioners in south east Scotland 1982-91.

Authors:  R M Herd; J A Hunter; K M McLaren; U Chetty; A C Watson; J M Gollock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-12

10.  Management of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.