Literature DB >> 4077803

Ventilatory responses of hamsters and rats to hypoxia and hypercapnia.

B R Walker, E M Adams, N F Voelkel.   

Abstract

As a fossorial species the hamster differs in its natural habitat from the rat. Experiments were performed to determine possible differences between the ventilatory responses of awake hamsters and rats to acute exposure to hypoxic and hypercapnic environments. Ventilation was measured with the barometric method while the animals were conscious and unrestrained in a sealed plethysmograph. Tidal volume (VT), respiratory frequency (f), and inspiratory (TI) and expiratory (TE) time measurements were made while the animals breathed normoxic (30% O2), hypercapnic (5% CO2), or hypoxic (10% O2) gases. Arterial blood gases were also measured in both species while exposed to each of these atmospheric conditions. During inhalation of normoxic gas, the VT/100 g was greater and f was lower in the hamster than in the rat. Overall minute ventilation (VE/100 g) in the hamster was less than in the rat, which was reflected in the lower PO2 and higher PCO2 of the hamster arterial blood. When exposed to hypercapnia, the hamster increased VE/100 g solely through VT; however, the VE/100 g increase was significantly less than in the rat. In response to hypoxia, the hamster and rat increased VE/100 g by similar amounts; however, the hamster VE/100 g increase was through f alone, whereas the rat increased both VT/100 g and f. Mean airflow rates (VT/TI) were no different in the hamster or rat in each gas environment; therefore most of the ventilatory responses were the result of changes in TI and TE and respiratory duty cycle (TI/TT).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4077803     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.6.1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  9 in total

1.  Respiration in neonate sea turtles.

Authors:  Edwin R Price; Frank V Paladino; Kingman P Strohl; Pilar Santidrián T; Kenneth Klann; James R Spotila
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Comparative respiratory strategies of subterranean and fossorial octodontid rodents to cope with hypoxic and hypercapnic atmospheres.

Authors:  I H Tomasco; R Del Río; R Iturriaga; F Bozinovic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Loss of acid-sensing ion channel 2 enhances pulmonary vascular resistance and hypoxic pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Neil D Detweiler; Lindsay M Herbert; Selina M Garcia; Simin Yan; Kenneth G Vigil; Joshua R Sheak; Thomas C Resta; Benjimen R Walker; Nikki L Jernigan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-06-06

4.  Increased hemoglobin O2 affinity protects during acute hypoxia.

Authors:  Ozlem Yalcin; Pedro Cabrales
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Automated evaluation of respiratory signals to provide insight into respiratory drive.

Authors:  Obaid U Khurram; Heather M Gransee; Gary C Sieck; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Cardiorespiratory responses of the woodchuck and porcupine to CO2 and hypoxia.

Authors:  D F Boggs; G F Birchard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure support ventilation in small species and the impact of instrumental dead space.

Authors:  Francesca Campoccia Jalde; Abdul Raoof Almadhoob; Jennifer Beck; Arthur S Slutsky; Michael S Dunn; Christer Sinderby
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  A model for control of breathing in mammals: coupling neural dynamics to peripheral gas exchange and transport.

Authors:  Alona Ben-Tal; Jeffrey C Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Role of acid-sensing ion channels in hypoxia- and hypercapnia-induced ventilatory responses.

Authors:  Neil D Detweiler; Kenneth G Vigil; Thomas C Resta; Benjimen R Walker; Nikki L Jernigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.