Literature DB >> 4077047

Problems in prenatal diagnosis of the ichthyosis congenita group.

M L Arnold, I Anton-Lamprecht.   

Abstract

The late onset of normal keratinization after week 24 menstrual age (MA) of fetal life is the cause of considerable problems with the prenatal diagnosis of congenital ichthyosis. This paper summarizes the experiences with prenatal diagnosis in nine pregnancies at risk of congenital ichthyosis and one at risk of chondrodysplasia punctata, rhizomelic type. An important prerequisite--and the main problem--is the manifestation of the mutant genes early enough in fetal life to allow a safe exclusion. Continuous precocious keratinization of the interfollicular epidermis, hyperkeratosis, and/or specific markers of congenital ichthyosis such as various types of lipid inclusions had been expected. With a normal ultrastructure and development of fetal epidermis no evidence of ichthyosis was present in eight cases; all eight children were born healthy. Regional variations of the onset of keratinization of the interfollicular epidermis, observed in one of these eight fetuses as well as in one fetus at risk (but normal for) recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, posed considerable problems and might lead to a false-positive diagnosis. Examination after birth allowed one to localize these regions to areas close to the mamillae. Regional variations in addition to the well-known cranio-caudal gradient thus are normal findings: both children have normal skin. One fetus at risk of non-bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (type II) was involved without prenatal manifestation of interfollicular keratinization, specific markers, or increased numbers of cornified cells in the pilosebaceous follicles at 20 weeks MA. A slightly more irregular pattern of the horn cell contents was not regarded as sufficient evidence alone to indicate congenital ichthyosis. A severely affected boy was born in week 34 MA. Similarly the fetus at risk of chondrodysplasia punctata showed no skin abnormalities, neither at fetoscopy (week 22 MA) nor after abortion (week 24 MA) although based on other clinical features it was clearly affected. Thus, this genodermatosis cannot be diagnosed prenatally by its keratinization disturbances. In future cases, precocious keratinization and hyperkeratosis cannot be expected to be expressed before week 24 MA, and minor signs, such as irregularities of horn cell contents, have to be taken as an indication of involvement. Multiple biopsies are required, and a safe exclusion may be impossible before week 22 MA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4077047     DOI: 10.1007/BF00388455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  15 in total

1.  [Ultrastructure of inborn erors of keratinization. I. Ichthyosis congenita].

Authors:  I Anton-Lamprecht
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Forsch       Date:  1972

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of Harlequin fetus.

Authors:  C Blanchet-Bardon; Y Dumez; F Labbé; M A Lutzner; A Puissant; R Henrion; A Bernheim
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The ichthyoses--pathogenesis and prenatal diagnosis: a review of recent advances.

Authors:  M L Williams
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Clinical, histologic, and cell kinetic discriminants between lamellar ichthyosis and nonbullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma.

Authors:  M Hazell; R Marks
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1985-04

5.  Heterogeneity in autosomal recessive ichthyosis. Clinical and biochemical differentiation of lamellar ichthyosis and nonbullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma.

Authors:  M L Williams; P M Elias
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1985-04

6.  Prenatal diagnosis of harlequin ichthyosis.

Authors:  S Elias; M Mazur; R Sabbagha; N B Esterly; J L Simpson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma (epidermolytic hyperkeratosis) by fetal skin biopsy.

Authors:  M S Golbus; R W Sagebiel; R A Filly; T D Gindhart; J G Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Elevated n-alkanes in congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma. Phenotypic differentiation of two types of autosomal recessive ichthyosis.

Authors:  M L Williams; P M Elias
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: ultrastructure and biochemistry of skin and amniotic fluid cells from two affected fetuses and a newborn infant.

Authors:  K A Holbrook; B A Dale; V P Sybert; R W Sagebiel
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 10.  Genetically induced abnormalities of epidermal differentiation and ultrastructure in ichthyoses and epidermolyses: pathogenesis, heterogeneity, fetal manifestation, and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  I Anton-Lamprecht
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recessive ichthyosis congenita type II.

Authors:  K M Niemi; L Kanerva; K Kuokkanen
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Clinical, light and electron microscopic features of recessive ichthyosis congenita type III.

Authors:  K M Niemi; L Kanerva; C F Wahlgren; J Ignatius
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.017

3.  Harlequin Ichthyosis among the Navajo: Counseling issues.

Authors:  P N Olney; R S Olney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.537

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.