Literature DB >> 4075139

Reinforcement delay of one second severely impairs acquisition of brain self-stimulation.

J Black, J D Belluzzi, L Stein.   

Abstract

The effect of delayed reinforcement on the acquisition of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation was investigated. Brain stimulation reinforcement minimizes cues associated with reinforcement delivery (secondary reinforcement) and, by eliminating consummatory responses, permits precise temporal control of the interval between the operant response and reinforcement. Different groups were trained in daily 1-h sessions for brain stimulation reinforcement at one of 4 delay intervals (1, 2, 3 or 6 s). Responses made during the delay interval were not reinforced and reset the delay timer. Control groups (IMMEDIATE) were reinforced immediately, but were required to space responses--according to a delayed reinforcement of low rates (DRL) schedule--for an interval corresponding to one of the delay of reinforcement intervals. The DRL schedule equalized opportunities for reinforcement and non-reinforcement. At all intervals, rats trained with delayed reinforcement had significantly lower bar-press rates than controls trained with immediate reinforcement under DRL. When reinforcement schedules were switched (DELAY groups now get IMMEDIATE and vice versa), response rates rapidly shifted to levels appropriate to the new schedule. The pre-switch results indicate that delays even as short as 1 s markedly impede the acquisition of self-stimulation behavior. The post-switch results suggest that delay of reinforcement, like stimulation intensity, may determine the strength of hypothalamic reinforcement and hence final levels of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4075139     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91418-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

1.  Differentiating the rapid actions of cocaine.

Authors:  Roy A Wise; Eugene A Kiyatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Striatal dopamine in motor activation and reward-mediated learning: steps towards a unifying model.

Authors:  J Wickens
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1990

3.  A critical time window for dopamine actions on the structural plasticity of dendritic spines.

Authors:  Sho Yagishita; Akiko Hayashi-Takagi; Graham C R Ellis-Davies; Hidetoshi Urakubo; Shin Ishii; Haruo Kasai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A cellular analogue of operant conditioning.

Authors:  L Stein; B G Xue; J D Belluzzi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Reinforcement, dopamine and rodent models in drug development for ADHD.

Authors:  Gail Tripp; Jeff Wickens
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Dopaminergic lesions of the dorsolateral striatum in rats increase delay discounting in an impulsive choice task.

Authors:  Stephanie E Tedford; Amanda L Persons; T Celeste Napier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A behavioural correlate of the synaptic eligibility trace in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Kenji Yamaguchi; Yoshitomo Maeda; Takeshi Sawada; Yusuke Iino; Mio Tajiri; Ryosuke Nakazato; Shin Ishii; Haruo Kasai; Sho Yagishita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cocaine serves as a peripheral interoceptive conditioned stimulus for central glutamate and dopamine release.

Authors:  Roy A Wise; Bin Wang; Zhi-Bing You
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of NeoHebbian Three-Factor Learning Rules.

Authors:  Wulfram Gerstner; Marco Lehmann; Vasiliki Liakoni; Dane Corneil; Johanni Brea
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  A silent eligibility trace enables dopamine-dependent synaptic plasticity for reinforcement learning in the mouse striatum.

Authors:  Tomomi Shindou; Mayumi Shindou; Sakurako Watanabe; Jeffery Wickens
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.386

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.