Literature DB >> 4074116

Simulated leg-length discrepancy: its effect on mean center-of-pressure position and postural sway.

R K Mahar, R L Kirby, D A MacLeod.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that leg-length discrepancies of as little as 1cm would induce a significant postural shift and increase the extent of postural sway. We had 14 normal volunteers stand on a force platform with their feet in a standard position. Center-of-pressure data were recorded at 100Hz for 20 seconds while the subjects stood barefoot with no lifts or (in random order) with lifts of 1, 2, 3, and 4cm under their left and right feet. From these data we derived the mean center-of-pressure position and the extent of postural sway. Lifts of as little as 1cm shifted the mean center-of-pressure toward the longer leg to a statistically significant extent (p less than 0.001), the mean difference compared with the barefoot condition being 6.1% of the distance between the feet; increasing the discrepancy did not proportionately increase the effect. The postural sway (total travel of the center-of-pressure) in a mediolateral direction increased significantly with a 1cm discrepancy (p less than 0.01), and continued to increase in proportion to the magnitude of the discrepancy. There were no effects on anteroposterior position or sway and no influence of left-right dominance. These results support our hypothesis that a leg-length discrepancy of as little as 1cm may be biomechanically important.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4074116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  16 in total

Review 1.  Leg length inequality. Implications for running injury prevention.

Authors:  S T McCaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Biomechanical implications of mild leg length inequality.

Authors:  S T McCaw; B T Bates
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Lower limbs heterometry correction in patients with osteoporosis and increased risk of falls.

Authors:  Elisa Pratelli; Angelo Alito; Claudio Zanella; Laura Busi; Giuseppe Mangone; Matteo Scarselli; Pietro Pasquetti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-12-27

4.  Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Michael R Gay; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Preoperative leg-length inequality and hip osteoarthrosis: a radiographic study of 100 consecutive arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  K Tallroth; M Ylikoski; H Lamminen; K Ruohonen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Does the lower extremity alignment affect the risk of falling?

Authors:  Gülnur Taşçı Bozbaş; Gülcan Gürer
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-03

7.  Total knee arthroplasty: Limb length discrepancy and functional outcome.

Authors:  Shrinand V Vaidya; Mihir R Patel; Atul N Panghate; Parthiv A Rathod
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? Preliminary study.

Authors:  Małgorzata Eliks; Wioleta Ostiak-Tomaszewska; Przemysław Lisiński; Paweł Koczewski
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Leg Length Discrepancy: Dynamic Balance Response during Gait.

Authors:  Nurul Azira Azizan; Khairul Salleh Basaruddin; Ahmad Faizal Salleh; Abdul Razak Sulaiman; Muhamad Juhairi Aziz Safar; Wan Mohd Radzi Rusli
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Infrared thermography applied to lower limb muscles in elite soccer players with functional ankle equinus and non-equinus condition.

Authors:  David Rodríguez-Sanz; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Daniel López-López; César Calvo-Lobo; Patricia Palomo-López; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.