Literature DB >> 4072591

Comparison of rectal diazepam and subcutaneous morphine-scopolamine administration for outpatient sedation in minor oral surgery.

S Lundgren.   

Abstract

In a randomized cross-over study on sedation in outpatient oral surgery, subcutaneous administration of morphine-scopolamine was compared with rectal administration of diazepam. The mean dose of morphine was 0.13 mg kg-1 (range 0.13-0.24) and of diazepam 0.57 mg kg-1 (range 0.50-0.71). Apprehension, the determining factor for patients' preference for sedation method, the recovery from sedation and the postoperative course were studied. Both methods produced the desired effects. For diazepam, the effect was scored higher by the patient than the nurse observer and for morphine-scopolamine the opposite was found. Postoperative pain and patients' preference for sedation did not differ between the methods and the determining factor for the patients' preference for sedation method was the experience of stronger tranquilization. Side-effects such as prolonged recovery, nausea, dizziness, and dysphoria were frequent during the postoperative course after the morphine-scopolamine sedation but were not seen during diazepam sedation. Thus, rectal administration of diazepam should be preferred to morphine and scopolamine for sedation in minor oral surgery performed under local anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4072591     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the anxiolytic and amnestic effects of diazepam and midazolam for minor oral surgery.

Authors:  N H Luyk; M A Boyle; R P Ward-Booth
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr

2.  Serum concentration and drug effect after intravenous and rectal administration of diazepam.

Authors:  S Lundgren
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.