Literature DB >> 4066983

Frozen section diagnosis: an audit.

E K Dankwa, J D Davies.   

Abstract

A consecutive series of 1000 operative frozen section diagnoses was reviewed. Correct diagnosis was made at the time in 96.5% of the cases. Clinically relevant errors were found in 1.3% of the cases and unimportant errors in 0.9%. Diagnosis was deferred, to await subsequent paraffin sections, in a further 1.3%. All the errors and provisional diagnoses in the deferred cases were conservative false negative results; no false positive diagnosis of malignancy was made. The cases of incorrect or deferred diagnosis were analysed to ascertain the origin of the difficulties, which comprised: technical imperfection (three cases); the focal nature of the lesion (14); and pathological misinterpretation (28). More than one of these factors played a part in eight cases. Further retrospective assessment indicated that the factors leading to error or deferred diagnosis were avoidable in 57% and potentially avoidable in 43% of cases. Misinterpretation was the single factor responsible for all avoidable misdiagnoses or deferred diagnosis. None the less, unavoidable factors led to erroneous or deferred diagnosis in about 2% of operative frozen section requests. Using present methods this seems to be the irreducible minimum of failures to make the correct diagnosis when frozen sections are assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4066983      PMCID: PMC499419          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.38.11.1235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  20 in total

1.  Frozen-section diagnosis.

Authors:  P M PETERS
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1959-05-23

2.  Frozen sections; an evaluation of 1,810 cases.

Authors:  T WINSHIP; R V ROSVOLL
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  What can be expected of the surgical pathologist from frozen section examinations.

Authors:  R C HORN
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  On the routine use of frozen sections with a special view to diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  K E SJOLIN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1955

5.  The value of fresh frozen sections.

Authors:  M B DOCKERTY
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1952-09

6.  Frozen section experience in 3000 cases. Accuracy, limitations, and value in residency training.

Authors:  H Nakazawa; P Rosen; N Lane; R Lattes
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Reliability of frozen sections in gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  J C DiMusto
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Frozen section.

Authors: 
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  The role and limitations of frozen section diagnosis of a palpable mass in the breast.

Authors:  V A Kagali
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-02

10.  Frozen section diagnosis of breast tissue. Indications and limitations.

Authors:  H D Schwan
Journal:  Diagn Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981
View more
  6 in total

1.  Surgical Pathology and Intraoperative Consultation: An Audit.

Authors:  Mostafa Golam; Zarat Queen
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

2.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Frozen Section Compared to Permanent Section: A Single Center Study in Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Hatami; Zhaleh Mohsenifar; Seyed Navid Alavi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2015

3.  Frozen Section Evaluation of Margin Status in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: A Correlation Study of Frozen Section and Final Diagnoses.

Authors:  Eleanor M Layfield; Robert L Schmidt; Magda Esebua; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-08-23

4.  Application of intraoperative frozen section examination in the management of female breast cancer in China: a nationwide, multicenter 10-year epidemiological study.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Yu Ren; Rong Huang; Jian-Jun He; Wei-Liang Feng; Ya-Nan Kong; Feng Xu; Lin Zhao; Qing-Kun Song; Jing Li; Bao-Ning Zhang; Jin-Hu Fan; Xiao-Ming Xie; Shan Zheng; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section diagnosis in orbital and adnexal malignancies.

Authors:  Md Shahid Alam; Andrea Tongbram; Subramanian Krishnakumar; Jyotirmay Biswas; Bipasha Mukherjee
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Accuracy of Frozen Section with Histopathological Report in an Institute.

Authors:  Purbesh Adhikari; Paricha Upadhyaya; Smriti Karki; Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Shyam Thapa Chettri; Ajay Agrawal
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.406

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.