Literature DB >> 4066123

Prediction of body fat by skinfold caliper: assumptions and cadaver evidence.

A D Martin, W D Ross, D T Drinkwater, J P Clarys.   

Abstract

A series of assumptions required for use of skinfold calipers for the estimation of human body composition is examined in terms of direct evidence from the measurement and dissection of 6 male and 7 female cadavers. Skinfold compressibility showed significant inter-subject and inter-site differences with the highest values (64.7 percent and 63.8 percent) at the spinale and biceps sites and the lowest (33.6 percent and 34.4 percent) at the front thigh and medial calf. Skin thickness as a percentage of skinfold thickness was highest at the subscapular site (28.1 percent). Adipose tissue patterning showed great variability, indicating the importance of using skinfold caliper readings from a variety of different sites including upper limb, lower limb and trunk. Further sources of error include variability in fat content of adipose tissue (estimated at 20 percent in our sample) and in the internal and subcutaneous fat deposition. Recommendations for the use of skinfold calipers to assess adiposity and monitor change are made in the light of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4066123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes


  15 in total

Review 1.  Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union.

Authors:  Grant Duthie; David Pyne; Sue Hooper
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission.

Authors:  Timothy R Ackland; Timothy G Lohman; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Ronald J Maughan; Nanna L Meyer; Arthur D Stewart; Wolfram Müller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Variability in the measures of body fat. Assumptions or technique?

Authors:  A D Martin; D T Drinkwater
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Gross anatomical, CT and MRI analyses of the buccal fat pad with special emphasis on volumetric variations.

Authors:  Marios Loukas; Theodoros Kapos; Robert G Louis; Christopher Wartman; Ashley Jones; Barry Hallner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  Use of anthropometry for the prediction of regional body tissue distribution in adults: benefits and limitations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Aldo Scafoglieri; Jan Pieter Clarys; Erik Cattrysse; Ivan Bautmans
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 6.  Techniques of measurement of body composition. Part II.

Authors:  D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Body composition assessment.

Authors:  P S Davies
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Estimation of body composition in Chinese and British men by ultrasonographic assessment of segmental adipose tissue volume.

Authors:  R Eston; R Evans; F Fu
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  The role of fat mass index in determining obesity.

Authors:  Gerson Peltz; Maria Teresa Aguirre; Maureen Sanderson; Mary K Fadden
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

10.  Randomized trial of measures of body fat versus body weight in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  C L Birmingham; J L Muller; E M Goldner
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.