Literature DB >> 4060615

Fechner's paradox in binocular contrast sensitivity.

J Gilchrist, C McIver.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that binocular spatial contrast sensitivity in normal observers is higher than monocular sensitivity by some 42% across all spatial frequencies, an amount predictable on the basis of neural summation of the two monocular responses. Such summation predicts that a reduction of sensitivity in one eye would result in a fall in binocular sensitivity to a level approaching, but never lower than, that of the other eye. We present evidence that reduction in monocular sensitivity caused by reduced luminance can, in some subjects, lower binocular sensitivity to a level below that of the other eye, an analogue of Fechner's brightness paradox. In other subjects the expected summation occurs and binocular sensitivity always remains at or above the monocular level.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4060615     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90167-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstöm-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A nonlinear systems approach to Fechner's paradox.

Authors:  R A Gregson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Positive and negative polarity contrast sensitivity measuring app.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Eli Peli
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2016-02-14

4.  Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Authors:  Chase A Mackey; Jennifer McCrate; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Jessica Feller; Leslie Liberman; M Charles Liberman; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effect of unilateral mean luminance on binocular combination in normal and amblyopic vision.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhou; Wuli Jia; Chang-Bing Huang; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.