Literature DB >> 4059886

Change in muscle force following electrical stimulation. Dependence on stimulation waveform and frequency.

A Stefanovska, L Vodovnik.   

Abstract

Change in muscle force in healthy subjects due to electrical stimulation was accomplished with rectangular and sinusoidal currents. The pulse width of rectangular stimuli was 0.3 ms and repetition frequency was 25 Hz. The frequency of sinusoidal stimuli was 2 500 Hz, chopped by a 25 Hz rectangular signal. Thirteen healthy subjects were involved in the study and divided into three groups. The first group (A) had stimulation with rectangular impulses, the second (B) with sinusoidal impulses and the third (C) was a control group. The quadriceps muscle was stimulated daily for 10 minutes for 3 weeks. The maximal voluntary isometric torque increased for 25% in group A and 13% in group B, while there was no significant difference in group C. Different patterns of fatigue occurred with different stimuli. The presence of fatigue during the high frequency sinusoidal stimulation diminished the strengthening effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4059886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0036-5505


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise.

Authors:  K Hainaut; J Duchateau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Makii Muthalib; Marc Jubeau; Michael McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Electromyostimulation from a clinical perspective. A review.

Authors:  M C Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Muscle strength and its development. New perspectives.

Authors:  R M Enoka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Dose-Response Relationship Between Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Muscle Function in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Gustavo J Almeida; Samannaaz S Khoja; Sara R Piva
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.