Literature DB >> 4057215

Taking blood from children causes no more than minimal harm.

M Smith.   

Abstract

The ethical question of whether taking blood from normal children for research purposes is justified, is determined in part at least, by whether or not the children are harmed. To try to assess the risks, the effects of venepuncture on a group of healthy subjects were studied, by means of a parental questionnaire completed approximately eighteen months after the venepuncture had taken place. Ninety-two healthy children aged between 6 and 8 had a blood sample taken for non-therapeutic reasons as part of a research study. Questionnaire responses reveal few negative effects, and in some cases positive effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; British Paediatric Association; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4057215      PMCID: PMC1375174          DOI: 10.1136/jme.11.3.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Is venepuncture in neonatal research ethical?

Authors:  V S Shah; M al-Khannan; M W Quinn; J H Tripp
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  The ethics of drug research in children.

Authors:  T F Ackerman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 3.  Invasiveness of pharmacokinetic studies in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed I Altamimi; Imti Choonara; Helen Sammons
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.