Literature DB >> 4057051

Effects of dominance on group decision making: toward a stress-reduction explanation of groupthink.

M R Callaway, R G Marriott, J K Esser.   

Abstract

Janis (1972) proposed that groupthink is essentially a stress-reduction process. Cohesive groups reduce the stress of decision making by suppressing critical inquiry. Theoretically, groupthink could be prevented in cohesive groups if the stress could be diffused by other factors. We investigated the effects of task structure (decision-making procedures) and an individual factor (dominance) on the quality of group decision making, anxiety, and symptoms of groupthink. Students (n = 112) participated in twenty-eight 4-person, mixed-sex groups. Groups composed of highly dominant members made higher quality decisions, exhibited lower state anxiety, and took more time to reach a decision. They also tended to make more statements of disagreement and agreement, and to report more group influence on the members. Decision-making procedures had little effect on the decision process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4057051     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.49.4.949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  2 in total

1.  Developing a Clinician Friendly Tool to Identify Useful Clinical Practice Guidelines: G-TRUST.

Authors:  Allen F Shaughnessy; Akansha Vaswani; Bonnie K Andrews; Deborah R Erlich; Frank D'Amico; Joel Lexchin; Lisa Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  The more the merrier? Increasing group size may be detrimental to decision-making performance in nominal groups.

Authors:  Ofra Amir; Dor Amir; Yuval Shahar; Yuval Hart; Kobi Gal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.