Literature DB >> 4056670

Development of a decision aid for women choosing a method of birth control.

E M Wall.   

Abstract

The choice of a contraceptive method is complex and difficult. This study identifies issues for concern for women in selecting a birth control method, examines the accuracy of a self-administered questionnaire based upon these outcomes in predicting actual use, and in a preliminary fashion evaluates the usefulness of such an instrument as a decision aid. A questionnaire was designed to assess women's perceptions of the likelihood of each issue of concern for four birth control methods--oral contraceptives, intrauterine device (IUD), diaphragm, and foam or condoms--as well as the relative value of each issue. It was then tested among a convenience sample of 106 women. A weighted score was constructed by combining likelihood and value estimates for each contraceptive method. The method with the highest score was compared with actual contraceptive use and the intention to use such methods in the future. Positive predictive values were highest for pill use (83 percent) and lowest for IUD use (40 percent). While 65 percent of the sample were satisfied with their current method, 60 percent also found the questionnaire helpful. This attitude was most prevalent among younger, unmarried women. A decision aid for contraceptive decision making appears to be reasonably predictive of actual contraceptive use and helpful in thinking about the choice of a birth control method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrier Methods; Behavior; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Methods Chosen; Contraceptive Usage; Decision Making; Demographic Factors; Family Planning; Fertility; Iud; Oral Contraceptives; Population; Population Dynamics; Psychological Factors; Questionnaire Design; Questionnaires; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Satisfaction; Spermicidal Contraceptive Agents; Studies; Survey Methodology; Surveys; Vaginal Diaphragm; Vaginal Foam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4056670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  2 in total

1.  The attitude/behavior discrepancy as a methodological artifact: comment on 'sexually active adolescents and condoms'.

Authors:  C A Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Ryan T Anderson; Douglas Creedon; Victor M Montori; John Bachman; Patricia Erwin; Annie LeBlanc
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.