Literature DB >> 4056220

Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II.

W A Dreschler, R Plomp.   

Abstract

Twenty-one sensorineurally hearing-impaired adolescents were studied with an extensive battery of tone-perception, phoneme-perception, and speech-perception tests. Tests on loudness perception, frequency selectivity, and temporal resolution at the test frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz were included. The mean values and the gradient across frequencies were used in further analysis. Phoneme-perception data were gathered by means of similarity judgments and phonemic confusions. Speech-reception thresholds were determined in quiet and in noise for unfiltered speech material, and with additional low-pass and high-pass filtering in noise. The results show that hearing loss for speech is related to both the frequency resolving power and temporal processing by the ear. Phoneme-perception parameters proved to be more related to the filtered-speech thresholds than to the thresholds for unfiltered speech. This finding may indicate that phoneme-perception parameters play only a secondary role, and for that reason their bridging function between tone perception and speech perception is only limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4056220     DOI: 10.1121/1.392895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Development of digital hearing AIDS.

Authors:  C Schweitzer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-06

2.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

3.  Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Jin Tae Lee; Hye Jeong Heo; Chul-Hee Choi; Seong Hee Choi; Kyungjae Lee
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-04-17

4.  Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Ray L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Louis D Braida; Charlotte M Reed
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-02-21

5.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Overview of Central Auditory Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samuel R Atcherson; Naveen K Nagaraj; Sarah E W Kennett; Meredith Levisee
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

9.  Real-time contrast enhancement to improve speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Rick L Jenison; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Speech-Recognition Threshold (SRT) in Noise Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.