Literature DB >> 4055567

Bronchoconstriction in asthmatics exposed to sulfur dioxide during repeated exercise.

L J Roger, H R Kehrl, M Hazucha, D H Horstman.   

Abstract

Young male volunteers with mild asthma and hypersensitivity to methacholine were exposed for 75 min with natural breathing to 0.0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 ppm SO2. Each exposure included three 10-min periods of moderate treadmill exercise (minute ventilation 21 l . m-2 . min-1, O2 consumption 25 ml . kg-1, and heart rate 120/min). Specific airway resistance (sRaw) was not significantly increased after exercise in 0.25 ppm SO2, relative to the control exposure (clean air). In 0.5 and 1.0 ppm SO2, sRaw was increased twofold and threefold above preexposure levels, respectively, corresponding to increases of 3.2 and 9.2 cmH2O . s in excess over the increases seen in clean air (P less than 0.001). There was a broad range of responses to exercise and SO2. The increases in sRaw after the second and third exercises were significantly less than after the first exercise. Respiratory impedance measured by forced random noise suggests that the induced bronchoconstriction was primarily associated with peripheral airways. These results confirm that mild asthmatics selected for methacholine sensitivity have as a group significant bronchoconstriction in response to short-term moderate exercise with natural breathing in 1.0 and 0.5 ppm SO2. In addition, the induced bronchoconstriction is decreased after short-term repeated exercise in SO2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4055567     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.3.784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chemically induced nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  A Montanaro
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Local effects in the respiratory tract: relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Josje H E Arts; Cees de Heer; Ruud A Woutersen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Relationship between the airway response to inhaled sulfur dioxide, isocapnic hyperventilation, and histamine in asthmatic subjects.

Authors:  H Magnussen; R Jörres; H M Wagner; G von Nieding
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Environmental issues in managing asthma.

Authors:  Gregory B Diette; Meredith C McCormack; Nadia N Hansel; Patrick N Breysse; Elizabeth C Matsui
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 5.  Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Thomas Brüning; Rüdiger Bartsch; Hermann Maximillian Bolt; Herbert Desel; Hans Drexler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Andrea Hartwig; Rudolf Jäckh; Edgar Leibold; Dirk Pallapies; Albert W Rettenmeier; Gerhard Schlüter; Gisela Stropp; Kirsten Sucker; Gerhard Triebig; Götz Westphal; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Evaluation of the experimental basis for assessment factors to protect individuals with asthma from health effects during short-term exposure to airborne chemicals.

Authors:  Mia K V Johansson; Gunnar Johanson; Mattias Öberg
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 7.  Human health effects of air pollution.

Authors:  L J Folinsbee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.