Literature DB >> 4055450

Radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery in the treatment of barrel-shaped carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stages IB, IIA, IIB).

C A Perez, M S Kao.   

Abstract

This retrospective analysis reports the results of therapy in 128 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix classified as barrel-shaped or expanded cervix (over 5 cm in diameter). Seventy-five percent of the patients were treated with irradiation alone and 25% with combinations of irradiation and surgery. The results of therapy are compared with those observed in 714 patients with non-barrel-shaped carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with similar techniques during the same period of time. The distribution of histological type of tumor was similar in both groups (90% epidermoid carcinoma, 8% adenocarcinoma, and 2% adenosquamous carcinoma). Approximately 15% of the patients in both groups with Stage IB and 25% with Stage IIA and IIB had positive endometrial curettings (stromal invasion or replacement by tumor only). Thus, the aggressive behavior observed in the barrel-shaped tumors is not a result of endometrial involvement, but to the large volume of tumor present. The actuarial 5-year tumor free survival in Stage IB barrel-shaped cervix was 76% compared to 92% in the non-barrel-shaped lesions. In Stage IIA the 5-year NED survival for patients with barrel-shaped cervix was 60 compared to 80% for the patients with non-barrel-shaped cervix. In Stage IIB the survival rates were 58 and 70%, respectively. A noteworthy finding in this analysis is the high incidence of distant metastases in the patients with barrel-shaped cervix (32% in Stage IB, 40% in Stage IIA, and 32% in Stage IIB) in comparison with patients with non-barrel-shaped tumors (10% in Stage IB, 16% in Stage IIA, and 25% in Stage IIB). The incidence of pelvic failures was comparable in both groups. Higher doses of irradiation resulted in better tumor control, which was comparable to that observed with a combination of irradiation and surgery (conservative hysterectomy). The 5-year survival rate in Stage IB was similar in both the barrel-shaped and non-barrel-shaped tumors treated with irradiation alone or combination irradiation and surgery. In Stage IIA the non-barrel-shaped lesions had the same survival with either treatment technique. In the barrel-shape group, eight patients treated with irradiation alone or survival of 70%, compared to 45% in 24 patients treated with irradiation alone. However, these differences are not statistically significant (p = .50). In eight patients treated with definitive irradiation and a lymphadenectomy and four patients irradiated after an exploratory laparotomy, two major and three minor (grade 2) complications were noted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4055450     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90270-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Oxygen distributions partly explain the radiation response of human squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  P Okunieff; J de Bie; E P Dunphy; D J Terris; M Höckel
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1996-07

2.  Preoperative external beam radiotherapy and reduced dose brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: survival and pathological response.

Authors:  Alexandre A Jacinto; Marcus S Castilho; Paulo E R S Novaes; Pablo R Novick; Gustavo A Viani; João V Salvajoli; Robson Ferrigno; Antonio Cássio A Pellizzon; Stella S S Lima; Maria A C Maia; Ricardo C Fogaroli
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Uterine perforation and its dosimetric implications in cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yasir A Bahadur; Maha M Eltaher; Ashraf H Hassouna; Mohammad A Attar; Camelia Constantinescu
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-02-04

4.  Biological modelling of the radiation dose escalation effect of regional hyperthermia in cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Crezee; C M van Leeuwen; A L Oei; L E van Heerden; A Bel; L J A Stalpers; P Ghadjar; N A P Franken; H P Kok
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Incidence of Suboptimal Applicator Placement and the Resulting Dosimetric Impact in Image-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Ramya Rangarajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.