Literature DB >> 4055294

Monocular acuity and stereopsis in infantile esotropia.

E E Birch, D R Stager.   

Abstract

Monocular acuity and stereopsis were assessed by preferential-looking procedures in untreated infantile esotropes. Results were compared to an age-matched normal population. Monocular PL acuity was not significantly different from normal during months 3-14 for infantile esotropes who freely alternated fixation and for the preferred eyes of unilateral infantile esotropes. PL acuity of the non-preferred eyes of unilateral esotropes was significantly below normal during months 9-14, but not during months 3-8. The percentage of normal and esotropic infants who demonstrated PL stereopsis was approximately equal at 3-5 months but, unlike normal infants, the percentage of esotropic infants demonstrating stereopsis was lower in the older age groups. Taken together, the acuity results support previous reports that deficits in PL acuity develop after the onset of fixation preference. The results of PL stereopsis testing are consistent with the hypothesis that stereoscopic pathways are present and potentially functional in at least some esotropic infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4055294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  18 in total

1.  Retinotopically defined primary visual cortex in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; J Shane Kippenhan; Shruti Japee; Philip Kohn; Carolyn B Mervis; Ziad S Saad; Colleen A Morris; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Three horizontal muscle surgery for large-angle infantile esotropia: validation of a table of amounts of surgery.

Authors:  J E Camuglia; M J Walsh; G A Gole
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Preferential looking techniques yield important information in strabismic amblyopia follow-up.

Authors:  F V Brovarone; A Fea; L Chiadò Piat; G Porro; M Ponzetto; F Cortassa
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Monocular visual outcome in untreated early onset esotropia.

Authors:  W V Good; L C da Sa; C J Lyons; C S Hoyt
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 8.  Stereoacuity outcomes after treatment of infantile and accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Jingyun Wang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Causing and curing infantile esotropia in primates: the role of decorrelated binocular input (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Lawrence Tychsen
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

10.  Accommodation and vergence latencies in human infants.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.