Literature DB >> 4055051

Clinical experience with cefotaxime for the therapy of bacteremias due to gram-positive organisms.

C J Schleupner.   

Abstract

Fifty-five patients with gram-positive bacteremias were treated with cefotaxime after enrollment in comparative and non-comparative study protocols. Forty-nine of these 55 patients were evaluable and followed for their response to therapy and adverse effects. Most patients were white males 50 years of age or older (69%); 45% had two or more serious underlying diseases. Pneumonias caused 59% of these bacteremias, which were etiologically due to Streptococcus pneumoniae (22 episodes), Staphylococcus aureus (15), coagulase-negative staphylococci (3) and other streptococci (12). Overall, 90% of bacteremias were cured with cefotaxime therapy. Among five treatment failures were included three deaths, one due to cefotaxime-associated pseudomembranous colitis, one caused by a bacteremic superinfection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and one due to a progressive pneumonia despite therapy. Adverse effects of therapy were infrequent and noteworthy for only one patient with questionable nephrotoxicity and a lack of cefotaxime-associated coagulopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4055051     DOI: 10.1007/BF01644214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  30 in total

1.  Effect of media and blood on the antimicrobial activity of cephalosporins on serogroup D streptococci: a review.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; D F Sahm
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam.

Authors:  B Kemmerich; H Lode; G Belmega; T Jendroschek; K Borner; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibacterial activity of a new parenteral cephalosporin--HR 756: comparison with cefamandole and ceforanide.

Authors:  G W Counts; M Turck
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of activity and beta-lactamase stability of cefotaxime with those of six other cephalosporins.

Authors:  R P Mouton; G P Bongaerts; M van Gestel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The in vitro antimicrobial activity of desacetylcefotaxime compared to other related beta-lactams.

Authors:  E Schrinner; M Limbert; K Seeger; G Seibert; W J Novick
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility tests with cefotaxime and correlation with clinical bacteriologic response.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct

7.  Treatment of urinary tract infections with cefotaxime: noncomparative and prospective comparative trials.

Authors:  P O Madsen
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct

8.  Activity of moxalactam and cefotaxime alone and in combination with ampicillin or penicillin against group B streptococci.

Authors:  S H Landesman; M L Corrado; C E Cherubin; M F Sierra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Use of cefotaxime, a beta-lactamase stable cephalosporin, in the therapy of serious infections, including those due to multiresistant organisms.

Authors:  E L Francke; H C Neu
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Enterococcal infections in patients treated with moxalactam.

Authors:  R C Moellering
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.