Literature DB >> 4054135

Long-term follow-up after a controlled randomized post-myocardial infarction rehabilitation programme: effects on morbidity and mortality.

S Marra, V Paolillo, F Spadaccini, P F Angelino.   

Abstract

Prognosis during 4.5 years of follow-up after myocardial infarction (MI) in 2 groups of patients 25 to 65 years of age was related to physical rehabilitation and usual risk factors. We randomized 167 patients to a rehabilitation (R) group and a control (C) group (84 and 83 patients respectively). At the end of the training period, the R group had a significantly higher work capacity, a higher double product reached during the stress test and lower triglycerides. During the 55 months of follow-up after the physical training or the equivalent spontaneous activity, we observed the prevalence of risk factors and of cardiac events such as angina, new MI, unstable angina, coronary bypass grafting and cardiac death. Survival rate was 92.6% in the R group and 93.7% in the C group. There was no relationship between serum cholesterol levels, tobacco smoking, and blood pressure and mortality and morbidity after the infarction. R patients were more symptom-free (44% against 30%), and had almost the same number of episodes of unstable angina and of cardiac death. 6.1% of the R group and 11.2% of the C group developed a new myocardial infarction. As in previous randomized studies we did not reach statistical significance for long-term benefit, perhaps because of the low sample size. However, our study confirmed a favorable tendency in terms of symptoms and the self confidence of the R patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4054135     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  10 in total

Review 1.  Exercise in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  H J Bethell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  A controlled trial of community based coronary rehabilitation.

Authors:  H J Bethell; M A Mullee
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-12

3.  Is cardiac rehabilitation necessary?

Authors:  D P Lipkin
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-05

4.  Exercise after myocardial infarction: appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  E V Dunn
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Social support and prognosis following first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H C Bucher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Janice Hegewald; Uta E Wegewitz; Ulrike Euler; Jaap L van Dijk; Jenny Adams; Alba Fishta; Philipp Heinrich; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-14

Review 7.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

Review 8.  Rehabilitation in cardiac patients:what do we know about training modalities?

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Jan Berger; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.928

9.  Cardiac rehabilitation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Scott A Lear; Andrew Ignaszewski
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001

Review 10.  Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader N Kabboul; George Tomlinson; Troy A Francis; Sherry L Grace; Gabriela Chaves; Valeria Rac; Tamara Daou-Kabboul; Joanna M Bielecki; David A Alter; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.