Literature DB >> 4052638

Relationship of flow cytometry results to clinical and steroid receptor status in human breast cancer.

T E Kute, H B Muss, M Hopkins, R Marshall, D Case, L Kammire.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry (FC), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) analyses were performed on 226 breast cancers. The presence of steroid receptors was inversely proportional to proliferative index and percent aneuploidy. Within the two ER (+ and -) groups, the presence of PR did not add significantly to the comparison. The mean proliferative index for the diploid tumors was 17.5 +/- 6.8 compared to 27.8 +/- 9.8 for aneuploid tumors (p less than .001). The degree of aneuploidy, or DNA index, was not related to cell cycle kinetics or steroid receptor status. In 163 tissues analyzed for percent tumor present, a correlation between the relative number of aneuploid cells and percent tumor in the histologic review was observed. A study of the diploid tumors indicated greater than 75% had at least 10% tumor cells by histologic review. Since with FC one can observe at least 10% aneuploid cells in a tumor sample, it is our opinion that the percent aneuploidy in this study is not artifactually low due to sampling error. There was no significant relationship between nodal status or number of positive nodes and proliferative index, aneuploidy, or steroid receptor status. Metastatic tumors had a higher mean proliferative index, but this was not statistically significant. There was a relationship between age and proliferative index but not between age and ploidy status. In a small group of patients there was a trend for proliferative index and percent aneuploidy to be higher in the poorly differentiated and larger tumors when compared to the well differentiated and smaller tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4052638     DOI: 10.1007/BF02235742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  29 in total

1.  Improvements in steroid receptor assays including rapid computer analysis of data.

Authors:  T E Kute; M S Huske; A Shore; A L Rhyne
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4).

Authors:  E R Fisher; R M Gregorio; B Fisher; C Redmond; F Vellios; S C Sommers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Flow-cytometric DNA analysis in primary breast carcinomas and clinicopathological correlations.

Authors:  S B Ewers; E Långström; B Baldetorp; D Killander
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1984-07

Review 4.  Practical breast carcinoma cell kinetics: review and update.

Authors:  J S Meyer; R W McDivitt; K R Stone; M U Prey; W C Bauer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  DNA flow cytometry of breast carcinoma after acetic-acid fixation.

Authors:  J S Meyer; S Micko; J L Craver; R W McDivitt
Journal:  Cell Tissue Kinet       Date:  1984-03

6.  Cell proliferation and its relationship to clinical features and relapse in breast cancers.

Authors:  C Gentili; O Sanfilippo; R Silvestrini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The influence of age on the DNA ploidy levels of breast tumours.

Authors:  I W Taylor; E A Musgrove; M L Friedlander; M S Foo; D W Hedley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-05

8.  Relationship of steroid receptor, cell kinetics, and clinical status in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  T E Kute; H B Muss; D Anderson; K Crumb; B Miller; D Burns; L A Dube
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  G S Delides; G Garas; G Georgouli; D Jiortziotis; J Lecca; T Liva; J Elemenoglou
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Flow cytofluorometric analysis of cell cycle distributions using propidium iodide. Properties of the method and mathematical analysis of the data.

Authors:  J Fried; A G Perez; B D Clarkson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  15 in total

1.  DNA quantitation of Wilms' tumour (nephroblastoma) using flow cytometry and image analysis.

Authors:  S Gururangan; A Dorman; R Ball; B Curran; M Leader; F Breatnach; A O'Meara
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Comparison of image analysis and flow cytometric determination of cellular DNA content.

Authors:  C Cope; D Rowe; L Delbridge; J Philips; M Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  DNA ploidy level and S-phase fraction as prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  T Yokoe; M Izuo; T Ishida; Y Iino; T Kawai
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1990-09

5.  Prognostic value of nuclear DNA content in breast cancer in relation to tumor size, nodal status, and estrogen receptor content.

Authors:  A von Rosen; L E Rutqvist; J Carstensen; A Fallenius; L Skoog; G Auer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Nuclear morphometry and DNA densitometry of human gliomas by image analysis.

Authors:  Y Yoshii; A Saito; T Nose
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Pure and mixed mucinous breast carcinomas: DNA stemline and prognosis.

Authors:  S Toikkanen; E Eerola; T O Ekfors
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The relationship of estrogen receptor status to DNA ploidy in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Tsuchiya; M Nihei; Y Ando; S Suzuki; I Kimijima; R Abe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Genetic evolution of breast cancers. III: Age-dependent variations in the correlations between biological indicators of prognosis.

Authors:  Y Remvikos; H Magdelenat; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in invasive breast cancer--a study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S Toikkanen; H Joensuu; P Klemi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.